Carol, To iterate what David said, I think it may be easier to deal with this as a text file rather than a WP51 file, has the original file got many WP51 codes in it (I am remembering more on this than I really wanted to!).=20 Andrew. > -----Original Message----- > From: access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20 > [mailto:access-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of carol pearson > Sent: 23 May 2004 19:22 > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] Re: A WP51 QUERY - CAST YOUR MINDS BACK! >=20 > I probably will, David, and keep it simple and sure. >=20 >=20 > -- > Carol >=20 >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "David W Wood" <g3yxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 5:22 PM > Subject: [access-uk] Re: A WP51 QUERY - CAST YOUR MINDS BACK! >=20 >=20 > > Carol > > > > > > why not indicate with: > > > > /// that was the beginning of the text to change /// > > > > *** this is how it should really read *** > > > > at least is compatible in all formats - even .txt! > > > > David > > > > > > In message <00af01c44049$19062580$6401a8c0@FABIAN2>, carol pearson > > <carol.pearson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes > > >Can anyone remember much about WP51? I'm proof-reading a book for > someone > > >who still uses it and am myself using MS Office 2002. > > > > > >I'd like to indicate recommended changes etc in WORD then=20 > save the file > in > > >WP51 format, but am not sure if, then, they will be=20 > recognised in WP51. > Is > > >there any way of doing this, please? > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Carol > > > > > > > > > > > > > --=20 > > David W Wood > > > > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20