Subretinal implant uses light instead of batteries, shows promise in initial testing -- EngadgetGordon, I fear it's the latter. Similar implants seem to have been possible for quite a while now, and some of them much higher resolution. I'm on a macular degeneration list where such things are featured quite often, and a production version of whatever it is always seems to be at least 5 years in the future. Plenty to be hopeful about, but not to get over-excited about, in my umble opinion. Vince. ----- Original Message ----- From: Gordon Keen To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:36 AM Subject: [access-uk] Subretinal implant uses light instead of batteries, shows promise in initial testing -- Engadget Another tentative step towards a technological breakthrough? Or just a puff piece to attract research funding. Time, which is against me, will tell. http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/subretinal-bionic-eye-implant/ Subretinal implant uses light instead of batteries, shows promise in initial testing There's been significant progress in bringing sight to the blind in recent years, and this looks set to continue that miraculous trend. Scientists at Stanford University have invented a subretinal photodiode implant for people who have lost their vision due to degenerative retinal diseases. Existing tech involves batteries and wires, but the new implant works without such crude appendages. Instead, it's activated by near-infrared beams projected by a camera that's mounted on glasses worn by the patient. Those beams then stimulate the optice nerve to allow light perception, motion detection and even basic shape awareness. The glasses also have an onboard camera that records what the patient sees. It hasn't actually been tested with humans just yet, but the first few rodents volunteers have yet to lodge a single complaint.