[access-uk] Re: [VICUG-L] installing win2000pro?
- From: "George Bell" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:57:36 -0000
Just to be 100% clear here.
If you were using the standard version of JAWS for example
with Windows 98, then you would need to upgrade to the
Professional version of JAWS with Windows 2000.
JAWS standard will NOT work with WINDOWS 2000.
George.
________________________________
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of goshawk
Sent: 20 March 2006 12:44
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: VICUG-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: [VICUG-L] installing win2000pro?
I think I am ok with my screen reader, it only seems to be
with xp that requires an expensive upgrade, and I am pretty
sure all my hardware has win2000 drivers, so should work.
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: George Bell
<mailto:george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: VICUG-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:18 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: [VICUG-L] installing
win2000pro?
But 2000 Professional will still require the
professional version of a screen reader. You will also find
there are just as many hardware issues.
Trust me. I'm not your lawyer! (smile)
George.
________________________________
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of goshawk
Sent: 20 March 2006 12:09
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: VICUG-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: [VICUG-L] installing
win2000pro?
I chose 2000pro precisely because of those hardware
and screen reader issues with xp, as I do not want any extra
outlay for screen reader and possibly hardware upgrades.
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: George Bell
<mailto:george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: goshawk
<mailto:goshawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ;
VICUG-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:53 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: [VICUG-L]
installing win2000pro?
Hi Simon,
I guess the first question to ask is why
install an operating system which has reached the end of its
life-cycle? Microsoft stopped supplying on March 31st 2005.
Essentially Windows XP Professional is the
current equivalent, and indeed fixes many problems inherent
in Windows 2000. But do you in fact need all the security
features of XP or even Windows 2000. XP Home itself is
cheaper, and a major improvement anyway.
The most important consideration is the
hardware itself, so take a look at
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/evaluation/sysreqs.ms
px, and be prepared for even more research of the individual
components such as CD writers, etc. Check with the
individual manufacturers to ensure their hardware is up
scratch.
Bear in mind that you may need to upgrade
your screen reader, and in some cases, it may be necessary
to migrate to the professional version of that.
George.
________________________________
From: Visually Impaired Computer Users'
Group List [mailto:VICUG-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
goshawk
Sent: 20 March 2006 11:05
To: VICUG-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [VICUG-L] installing win2000pro?
hello list,
I am thinking of changing my os to
win2000pro, and would like to know the following.
can I just install it over the current os,
which is win98se, or do I have to wipe the machine clear
first?
is the installation strait forward?
are there any options I should change rather
than just letting it go ahead, to ensure better running of
the machine?
any other pointers also would be welcome, as
I haven't done anything like this before, but win98 is
starting to get on my nerves a bit.
Simon
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer
User Group List. To join or leave the list, send a message
to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In the body of the message,
simply type "subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l"
without the quotations. VICUG-L is archived on the World
Wide Web at http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
Other related posts: