that's a good point. What I think really could have been done at the beginning of opening up access-uk on freelists, is to post the first e-mail explaining all the processes that people would need to got through in order to get off list, set their account to digest, set account to no mail/vacation so that everyone here can sort that out themselve. i think the Ecartis help file made no sense to a lot of people what so ever. I'm actually now at the freelists website sniffing around their FAQ to equaint myself with what's in regards to setting my account to no mail during holiday periods and anything else that i think i need to know for now. hopefully this'll come clearer soon. JUstin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Stone" <alex.stone@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 6:02 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: intentionally flooding the list? > Barry, Ray has not posted the only message that explains how to get off the > list, I've posted at least three messages over the past week to ten days > with instructions on how to do it: > Right, for those of you who still appear to be hard of thinking, what you > need to do is: > send an e-mail to: mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the subject line. > See, it's really not complicated! > Alex > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Barry" <bbinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 5:42 PM > Subject: [access-uk] Re: intentionally flooding the list? > > > > Odd that they didn't read and reply to the only message that explained how > to get off the list that was posted by Ray last week. > > binc > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Justin R > > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 5:23 PM > > Subject: [access-uk] Re: intentionally flooding the list? > > > > > > > > > "Peter Logue" Subject: [access-uk] intentionally flooding the list? > > > > > > > I wouldn't intentionally flood the list. There's more >of us here who > can > > > send danrakoczy@xxxxxxxxx and >andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx dozens of > > personal > > > replies. LOL. > > > > > > > what are you suggesting Peter LOL! > > > > I found that method a bit annoying when there were different e-mails > with > > famillier subject headings of past posts but, the body of e-mail was > saying > > the same thing. I don't think that's gonna solve the problem somehow. > > > > JUstin > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >