[AR] Re: [AR] Re: Open Source Igniter / Rocket

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "gnsortino@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:35:49 +0000

It’s ben a while since I tested but I mainly do soap bubble testing and I don’t 
recall there being any leakage. I’ve also hot-fired shapeways 3d printed 
engines and have not seen any issues with leakage. I will re-test again in the 
next few weeks and report back to the list.


I read through a lot of Paul’s comments about Shapeways and I haven’t had many 
of the same issues. I suspect that since he was such an early adopter that he 
experienced more problems while Shapeways worked out the kinks. A friend of 
mine used to be a 3d printing engineer at Shapeways and he worked a lot on 
improving their build quality. The two issues that I have are printing internal 
geometry and the material does rust/oxidize when exposed to water.


If anyone does try printing anything sophisticated I’d strongly suggest going 
through ExOne rather than Shapeways. They are about the same price as Shapeways 
but will have an engineer manually review designs before printing. This catches 
a lot of printability issues. I also find for some reason that prints come out 
much better with ExOne versus shapeways. Not sure exactly why this is the case 
but I suspect they have more stringent quality controls. The downside of ExOne 
is that their service is not as streamlined and user friendly as Shapeways


For example, my latest engine is regenerative and the injector has pretty small 
diameter holes so I had those parts by ExOne. Something simple like my igniter 
I can just print on shapeways.


igniter: http://shpws.me/ER6i

injector: http://shpws.me/ER6e

engine: http://shpws.me/ER6b









From: RM
Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎February‎ ‎12‎, ‎2015 ‎9‎:‎29‎ ‎AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx





They must have improved their process then.   See paul's experience below.



http://unreasonablerocket.blogspot.com/2010/08/getting-back-to-rockets.html





How are you measuring pressure tightness?  Did you try submerging the entire 
part in water to see if it bubbled?




-RM



On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Redacted sender gnsortino@xxxxxxxxx for DMARC 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Shapeways SS is not porous. I’ve pressure tested it up to 2000psi without 
noticing any leaking. The challenge is building internal geometry as the 2 step 
printing process leaves a powder residue that if not cleared out will sinter 
and block internal passageways. The SLS process is very good and quite cheap 
for simple parts like igniters.






From: RM
Sent: ‎Wednesday‎, ‎February‎ ‎11‎, ‎2015 ‎9‎:‎49‎ ‎PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx







$15 is pretty darned attractive.   How did it work?  I think I recall that Paul 
Breed found that the Shapeways sintered/infused stainless was too porous for 
his liking.



On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Lloyd Droppers <ldroppers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I did see your pr56 igniter, and I like it. Frankly I like the work on your 
website from the valves to the 3d printed chamber, and you we're one of the 
inspirations for me to post my own open source rocket work.



I had initially looked at making the igniter conventionally machine, but when I 
looked at Shapeways with a $15.00 price and 2 week leadtime for the igniter I 
had to give that a try first.




Lloyd





On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, RM <rocketmoonlighter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Very cool Lloyd.



I posted my latest design iteration of my igniter a few months back 




http://www.rocketmoonlighting.com/projects/pr56-igniter




It looks similar in design to yours, but the body is conventionally machined.  
The fully dimensioned drawing is on the page for download.   I've tested it 
with gox/propane, gox/kerosene, and n20/propane. 




I have an extra body ready to go if anyone would like to try it out




RM



On Friday, February 6, 2015, Lloyd Droppers <ldroppers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Hi aRocket, you've been pretty quiet lately so I thought I would add something 
to the mix. I've been working for the past couple months on an open source 
liquid powered rocket , and I thought the list might be interested.



- 3d printedGOX / IPA igniter up and running




- All the igniter documentation (CAD / Arduino / P&ID) and some design codes 
are on the website




- I'm doing a once a day Instagram (ProcectEarendel) for various rocket doodles 
and project related picture




- And a Kickstarter to try to build a suborbital test vehicle.




Hope that you all find it interesting, after 10 years building rockets for 
other people, it is fun to do my own thing that I can share.




Lloyd

Other related posts: