[AR] Re: Anyone heard of this?
- From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:07:35 -0700
Hummm this looks similar to the resonate cavity experiment I mentioned
using the fusor for quantum tunneling. It's basically similar. Wish I
had the lab set up to do this kind of thing. I'll get around to it I
hope. They just need to up the frequency to the background radiation
level and use a klystron to pump it.
Anyway very interesting thanks for posting guy's.
Monroe
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: Anyone heard of this?
> From: Nathan Mogk <nm8911@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, August 01, 2014 1:00 pm
> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> It doesn't look like the full text of the article is available on the AIAA
> website yet. I will be interested to read it when it comes out. I had been
> following this and similar technology for about eight months now. I was
> under the impression that Eagleworks Labs had already done a bench test of
> a similar device.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Monroe L. King Jr. <
> monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Thomas
> > My computer has gone nuts since I clicked on the wired article so I
> > don't know what's going on? Weird and not cool. I'll have to do a scan
> > and see wtf happened. May not have been that link I don't know. Just a
> > PITA at the moment.
> >
> > Monroe
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: [AR] Re: Anyone heard of this?
> > > From: Thomas McNeill <thomas.mcneill@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Fri, August 01, 2014 12:46 pm
> > > To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > "Test results indicate that the RF resonant cavity thruster design,
> > > which is unique as an electric propulsion
> > > device, is producing a force that is not attributable to any classical
> > > electromagnetic phenomenon and
> > > therefore is potentially demonstrating an interaction with the quantum
> > > vacuum virtual plasma. Future test
> > > plans include independent verification and validation at other test
> > facilities."
> > > http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20140006052.pdf
> > >
> > > It is in the PDF. No ads over the article from Wired. I used chrome
> > > to view it.
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Monroe L. King Jr.
> > > <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > That first link is horrible no way I can see that article because of
> > > > some advertizement. The second is so abstract and whimsical you can't
> > > > understand it so? No not really. Have any other links?
> > > >
> > > > Monroe
> > > >
> > > >> -------- Original Message --------
> > > >> Subject: [AR] Anyone heard of this?
> > > >> From: Willow Schlanger <wschlanger@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> Date: Fri, August 01, 2014 12:28 pm
> > > >> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The news is almost too good to be true. Maybe this is an April fools
> > joke
> > > >> in August?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive
> > > >>
> > > >> http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Willow
> > > >
> >
> >
Other related posts: