If you don't seal the injector, seems like you'd have to have one heckuva hydrotesting pump to maintain the pressure and flow rate. I suppose they could have tried a full-flow test with water in the propellant tanks instead of lox and alcohol, but it's always a question of how much time and expense do you put into testing (and drying out your hardware after the test!). Hindsight's always 20-20. I wish them well--they have a very exciting program. Paul M On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Henrik Schultz <henrik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > It sounds like this is a regen cooled engine and the pressure in the >> cooling >> passages caused the chamber to collapse inward. It's the differential >> pressure between the cooling passages and chamber that causes this so in >> order for a hydro test to catch this you would have to seal the injector >> somehow. A normal hydro test where you plug the nozzle wouldn't catch it. >> It's a hard test to do and they are not the first group this has happened >> to. >> > Why seal the injector? The pressure will build up on the backside of the > injector regardless (key point for good atomization). Yeah, you may lose a > bit of pressure through the cooling channels until you reach the injector, > but OTOH having ambient pressure in the chamber/nozzle vs. your operating > pressure, will only increase the pressure differential. The nozzle and > cooling jacket must obviously be designed to withstand any transients > during engine start-up (like water hammering effect), as well as softening > from the pre-heat stage. Do we have any design info? This is an open-source > project they claim ... > > /Henrik > > >