[AR] Re: New Glen mock-up.

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:15:16 -0700

I haven't been following New Glenn closely - I've had distractions - but it seems obvious to me that IF this "dummy version" was built using some of the same manufacturing processes and tooling as the flight vehicle - I'd guess so from the photo but don't know - it's a very useful workup for the production team, a chance to practice and get up to speed on building the main structures where minor mistakes are not critical and easily corrected.

And if as seems very likely it has been built to the same dimensions and specs as the flight first stage (and presumably had mass added to accurately simulate the missing bits, engines, tanks etc) then it's also a very useful workout/debugger tool for the (necessarily substantial) ground handling arrangements for the flight boosters, again with much less worry about making and correcting minor mistakes.

IOW, they only have to learn to avoid ONE flight-booster destroying error with this test piece for it to more than pay for itself.  Not so?

Henry

On 11/10/2021 4:45 AM, roxanna Mason wrote:

It's a moral booster not rocket,
Otherwise a waste of money,

Ken

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 6:53 PM Anthony Cesaroni <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    
https://www.geekwire.com/2021/blue-origin-practices-dummy-version-new-glenn-orbital-rocket-florida/
    
<https://www.geekwire.com/2021/blue-origin-practices-dummy-version-new-glenn-orbital-rocket-florida/>

    Anthony J. Cesaroni

    President/CEO

    Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace

    http://www.cesaronitech.com/ ;<http://www.cesaronitech.com/>

    (941) 360-3100 x1004 Sarasota

    (905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto


Other related posts: