[AR] Re: Nothing to do with rockets.

  • From: "Troy Prideaux" <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 10:15:53 +1000

From my (albeit naïve) understanding, Elon’s driving goal has always been Mars 
– which ultimately requires (in the absence of new physics) a BFR.

 

Troy

 

From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Anthony Cesaroni
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 10:10 AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Nothing to do with rockets.

 

Hi Bill,

 

One could argue that the plateau was reached with the 747 and finally the 
A-380. Operational costs and the overestimate of the hub model in the case of 
the latter. The 777 appears to be able to sustain the “jumbo” mission and 
operational cost models currently as I understand it. That said, I’m not sure 
that it’s apples to apples when it comes to comparing any of this to 
spacecraft. Elon certainly believes bigger is better and it will be required 
for his mission goals.

 

Best.       

 

Anthony J. Cesaroni

President/CEO

Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace

 <http://www.cesaronitech.com/http://www.cesaronitech.com/

(941) 360-3100 x1004 Sarasota

(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto

 

From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
<arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > On Behalf 
Of William Claybaugh
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 7:53 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Nothing to do with rockets.

 

Rand:

 

Just like the airlines.

 

Bill

 



Other related posts: