It will cost you well into the 6 figures to defend a judgment in your favor,
assuming your patent is helium leak tight. Most are not and filled with
dependent claims big enough to drive a truck through. Assuming you do receive a
judgement in your favor, all of the expenses of enforcement and collection of
damages are on your dime. Good luck and especially if it’s a foreign violator.
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
<http://www.cesaronitech.com/> http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Stephen Daniel
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2020 8:11 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Printed engine patent
Patents are supposed to be a non obvious extension of the prior art. I'm not
sure how patent examiners decide to award patents, but non-obvious is never a
requirement, and extension often isn't.
You can use these arguments in court, if you've the bankroll for an expensive
court fight. The whole system has completely broken.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 5:28 PM David Gregory <david.c.gregory@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:david.c.gregory@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
This is an awarded patent right? I think maybe the examiner didn’t do their
job so well.
On Mar 7, 2020, at 2:23 PM, Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
After a quick scan through, it reminds me of the attempt to patent the
blinking cursor.
There might be some genuinely novel details in there, mind, but they weren't
obvious to a quick scan. LOTS of stuff that's been routine since forever
folded in there.
Can't blame 'em for trying, I suppose...
On 3/7/2020 2:14 PM, Ben Brockert wrote:
Interesting diagrams, surprisingly weak claims.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10527003B1/en