<< Scout was actually quite an interesting rocket, although technical details
are often hard to find. >>
Many technical details here, in one of the best reports I've found on the Scout
launch vehicle. (Although it depends how deep you want to drill down on the
technical details.)
NASA Contractor Report 165950, Part 1
Scout Launch Vehicle Program
Final Report - Phase VI
Available here:
https://ia802606.us.archive.org/13/items/nasa_techdoc_19820073028/19820073028.pdf
Charles E. (Chuck) Rogers
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Mar 3, 2018 12:16 pm
Subject: [AR] Re: Regarding Univerity solid rockets for cube-sat launch to orbit
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, William Claybaugh wrote:
...I concluded Liquid Injection was more achievable than pivoting the
nozzle. Both are much more expensive than fins in the exhaust or moveable
canards which are probably the lowest cost; cold gas jets may be the next
lowest in cost if one wants exoatmopheric steering.