[AR] Solid Motor Length & Volume (Was Re: Aluminium vs Magnalium)

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:37:51 -0700

This came up earlier, with several mentioning motor length as determining how high a metal particle fraction could usefully be included in an APCP solid motor.

My thought then was that ratio of chamber volume to throat area should be the main thing determining combustion dwell time of a particle within a solid motor, analogous to liquid motor L* determining how much time liquid fuel droplets have to combust.

You mention both volume and length as factors. Should I understand then that solid motor length is also a factor, even beyond the strict matter of how much it contributes to available combustion volume? IE, that a long skinny solid motor would combust metal particles more completely than a short fat one of identical internal volume?

And, out of curiosity, do solid motor designers even use L* as a design parameter? Or some equivalent, or partial equivalent?

Thanks for the very informative discussion of metal particles, BTW.

Henry

On 4/9/2018 6:36 AM, Jim Rosson wrote:

Note-When using high levels of any metal, be aware that a motor needs sufficient chamber volume and length to allow complete reaction of metal powder into reacted molecules.  Failure to have large enough space, will result in metal slag collecting on nozzle and/or burning in plume (creating lower combustion efficiency than expected).

Other related posts: