[AR] Re: alternate propulsion

  • From: "John Dom" <johndom@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:52:13 +0100

Or:

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a30337693/powder-nuclear-fus
ion/?source=nl&utm_source=nl_pop&utm_medium=email&date=122719&utm_campaign=n
l18948936&src=nl

(not that I trust P.M. stories much).

John D.

-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Henry Spencer
Sent: donderdag 26 december 2019 18:58
To: arocket list
Subject: [AR] Re: alternate propulsion

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, James Fackert wrote:

Letting the statements sink in ...
"Boeing would build massive infrastructure and launch power satellites if
there was big money in it"

More precisely, Boeing would happily supply the launches if the powersat 
builders were paying cash on the barrelhead.  That's not saying that 
Boeing would put its own money into this!  (Dana Andrews, 20 years ago: 
"We're an $80G/yr company, we are not entrepreneurial.")

Henry


Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. arocket
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2019