A member of the Australian military. (photo: TribunNews)
Australia Beckons a War with China
By John Pilger, johnpilger.com
15 April 17
Australia is sleep-walking into a confrontation with China. Wars can happen
suddenly in an atmosphere of mistrust and provocation, especially if a minor
power, like Australia, abandons its independence for an "alliance" with an
unstable superpower.
The United States is at a critical moment. Having exported its all-powerful
manufacturing base, run down its industry and reduced millions of its
once-hopeful people to poverty, principal American power today is brute
force. When Donald Trump launched his missile attack on Syria - following
his bombing of a mosque and a school - he was having dinner in Florida with
the President of China, Xi Jinping.
Trump's attack on Syria had little to do with chemical weapons. It was,
above all, to show his detractors and doubters in Washington's war-making
institutions - the Pentagon, the CIA, the Congress - how tough he was and
prepared to risk a war with Russia. He had spilled blood in Syria, a Russian
protectorate; he was surely now on the team. The attack was also meant to
say directly to President Xi, his dinner guest: this is how we deal with
those who challenge the top dog.
China has long received this message. In its rise as the world's biggest
trader and manufacturer, China has been encircled by 400 US military bases -
a provocation described by a former Pentagon strategist as "a perfect
noose".
This is not Trump's doing. In 2011, President Barack Obama flew to Australia
to declare, in an address to parliament, what became known as the "pivot to
Asia": the biggest build-up of US air and naval forces in the Asia Pacific
region since the Second World War. The target was China. America had a new
and entirely unnecessary enemy. Today, low-draft US warships, missiles,
bombers, drones operate on China's doorstep.
In July, one of the biggest US-led naval exercises ever staged, the biennial
Operation Talisman Sabre, will rehearse a blockade of the sea lanes through
which run China's commercial lifelines. Based on a Air-Sea Battle Plan for
war with China, which prescribes a preemptive "blinding" attack, this "war
game" will be played by Australia.
This is not urgent news. Rather, the news is the "threat" that China poses
to "freedom of navigation" in the South China Sea by building airstrips on
disputed reefs and islets. The reason why - the "noose" - is almost never
mentioned.
Australia in the 21st century has no enemies. Not even a melancholy colonial
imagination that conjured Asia falling down on us as if by the force of
gravity can conjure a single contemporary enemy. No one wants to bomb or
occupy Australia. Well, not yet.
As Australian political, military and intelligence establishments are
integrated into the war plans of a growing American obsession - the shift of
trading, banking and development power to the east - Australia is making an
enemy it never bargained for. A frontline has already been marked at Pine
Gap, the spy base the CIA set up near Alice Springs in the 1960s, which
targets America's enemies, beckoning, of course, massive retaliation.
Last October, the opposition Labor Party's defence spokesman, Richard
Marles, delighted the US admirals and generals at a conference in Hawaii by
demanding that Australian naval commanders should have the authority to
provoke nuclear-armed China in the disputed South China Sea. What is it
about some Australian politicians whose obsequiousness takes charge of their
senses?
While the coalition government of Malcolm Turnbull has resisted such a clear
and present danger, at least for now, it is building a $195 billion war
arsenal, one of the biggest on earth - including more than $15 billion to be
spent on American F-35 fighters already distinguished as hi-tech turkeys.
Clearly, this is aimed at China.
This view of Australia's region is shrouded by silence. Dissenters are few,
or frightened. Anti-China witch hunts are not uncommon. Indeed, who, apart
from former prime minister Paul Keating, speaks out with an unambiguous
warning? Who tells Australians that, in response to the "noose" around it,
China has almost certainly increased its nuclear weapons posture from low
alert to high alert?
And who utters the heresy that Australians should not have to "choose"
between America and China: that we should, for the first time in our
history, be truly modern and independent of all great power: that we should
play a thoughtful, imaginative, non-provocative, diplomatic role to help
prevent a catastrophe and so protect "our interests", which are the lives of
people.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner