The other day when thousands of brave high school kids marched to stop gun
violence I heard one of our local yocal talk show heads call them career
terrorists. I am sure Bloody Gina will have field day with them in her secret
prisons.
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Miriam Vieni
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 8:54 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] 'Bloody Gina' Should Not Lead the CIA
'Bloody Gina' Should Not Lead the CIA
A 2017 photo of CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel, who joined the agency in 1985.
(CIA via AP)
Editor's note: John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer. He
served 23 months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush
administration's torture program.
President Trump's nomination of CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel to be the new
director returns the country to the bad old days of torture and secret prisons.
Trump couldn't be any clearer that he has come down on the side of the
architects of the George W. Bush-era torture policy. Haspel was a protégé of
Jose Rodriguez, the CIA's notorious former deputy director for operations and
former director of the Counterterrorism Center (CTC), known as the godfather of
the torture program. Haspel served as Rodriguez's chief of staff at CTC.
Haspel has been at the CIA for 33 years. She's been described in the media as a
"seasoned intelligence veteran," with an "uncanny ability to get things done"
and as someone who "inspires those around her." I'm sure that's true for some.
But many of the rest of us who knew and worked with Gina Haspel at the CIA
called her "Bloody Gina."
The CIA will not permit me to talk about Haspel's time overseas. Suffice it to
say that others already have, and her career has been well documented in the
media. Most importantly, it was Haspel whom Rodriguez ordered to destroy
videotaped evidence of the torture of Abu Zubaydah, who many of us believed,
incorrectly, to be the third-ranking person in al-Qaida. And that was after the
White House counsel told her to preserve everything. She never apologized or
even attempted to explain herself. Rodriguez called her a patriot. I would say
that she committed "obstruction of justice," a felony.
Advertisement
Haspel's appointment as CIA director is wrong for a number of reasons.
First, just imagine the message this sends to the CIA workforce: Engage in
whatever war crimes or crimes against humanity you want, and there won't be any
repercussions. Don't worry about ethics. Don't worry about morality.
We'll cover for you. And you can destroy the evidence, too.
What message does that send to other countries around the world? What do we
tell our allies, the same ones we criticize every year in the State
Department's annual Human Rights Report? We tell them: "You know how we always
say that we're a beacon of respect for human rights and the rule of law? Well,
that's nonsense. We say those things only when it's expedient. Do as we say,
not as we do."
Our actions are also not lost on our enemies. A myriad of former intelligence
professionals will tell you that the torture program has been the greatest
recruitment tool terrorist groups around the world have ever had. It has
energized them. It's given them something to rally against. It swelled their
ranks. It was no coincidence that ISIS paraded its prisoners in front of
cameras wearing orange jumpsuits before beheading them. Gina Haspel has to take
responsibility for her role in that.
We should also ask ourselves who we want to be as Americans. Do we want to be
just another international rogue nation that tortures people? Do we want to be
the country that snatches people from one country and sends them to another to
be tortured and interrogated? Do we want to be the country that cynically
preaches human rights, then violates those same rights when we think nobody is
looking? Shouldn't we want to be that shining beacon, the country that every
other one looks up to?
Haspel's nomination is also an insult to the likes of Sen. John McCain, the one
person on Capitol Hill with the greatest moral authority to weigh in on
torture. McCain knows that torture is an abomination. It's un-American. We
should listen to him. Haspel's nomination is an insult to Defense Secretary
James Mattis, the retired four-star general who told Trump to his face during
the transition period that torture doesn't work, and to CIA Director Mike
Pompeo himself, who said in his confirmation hearings that he was opposed to
the torture program and would not reinstate it, even if the president ordered
him to do so.
There is some hope that the CIA's overseers on Capitol Hill will have the sense
to tell the president that this nomination is wrong. Sen. Dianne Feinstein,
D-Calif., the former chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
(SSCI), in 2013 objected to Haspel's temporary appointment as director of the
CIA's National Clandestine Service, the agency's operations directorate,
denying her the position on a permanent basis. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the
SSCI's ranking member, said he wanted assurances that Haspel intended to comply
with the spirit and letter of the law banning torture. She made no public
response. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has already said he will oppose her nomination.
If there was ever a time for Senate Democrats to stand together, it is now.
Our nation cannot afford to backslide into lawlessness. We cannot countenance
torture. We cannot look the other way. We cannot reward the torturers. Gina
Haspel more appropriately should be facing a judge to answer to charges of war
crimes. She ought not be in the director's office at the CIA.
John Kiriakou