[blind-democracy] Re: Chomsky's definition of anarchism

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 21:24:43 -0400

Left-wing libertarian is synonymous with anarchist and it has been for more than a century. That is why I so dislike right-wingers adopting the label libertarian. Libertarians have been left-wingers a lot longer than right-wingers have, but nowadays you hear the word libertarian and you automatically think right-winger. There are similarities though. Anarchists hold the position - mistakenly in my opinion - that class society is the result of the state. My position is that the state is the result of class society. But they hold that to end class society - and specifically capitalism - the state must be abolished first. Right-wing libertarians take pretty much the same position except that they are not concerned with the abolition of class society and see capitalism as a positive good. That is completely counter to traditional libertarianism.

---
David Hume
??? In our reasonings concerning matter of fact, there are all imaginable 
degrees of assurance, from the highest certainty to the lowest species of moral 
evidence. A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence. ???
???  David Hume,

On 11/2/2019 4:16 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:

This is what Chomsky said in the interview and it's how I would identify my
own position. Yesterday, I think it was John Keriakou who I heard on the
Useful Idiots podcast, identified himself as a left wing libertarian. He
probably meant the same thing. He'd been a Democrat for his whole life until
2012 when he was shafted by an interviewer on MSNBC.
Chomsky's quote below
Well, what does anarchism mean? And it's the whole long tradition actually
going back to classical liberalism. It fundamentally means opposition to
structures of authority and domination unless they can justify themselves.
Illegitimate structures of domination and hierarchy ranging from
paternalistic family to business which is a tyranny in which people rent
themselves as slaves, to international affairs. Anywhere across this domain
if you find illegitimate authority, it should be eliminated. rule by
unaccountable private tyrannies. I don't see anything libertarian about
that.

Miriam




Other related posts: