Dreams Deferred: Book Review of “Red International and Black Caribbean”
https://socialistaction.org/2020/05/23/dreams-deferred-book-review-of-red-international-and-black-caribbean/
May 23, 2020
Red International and Black Caribbean: Communists in New York City,
Mexico and the West Indies, 1919-1939, by Margaret Stevens, Pluto Press,
2017.
By MARTY GOODMAN
Margaret Stevens is one of the few writers to examine the fascinating
revolutionary history of the Caribbean and Mexico as a partisan of
revolution. Her book is a detailed look at the struggles and betrayals
between the two World Wars at the hands of U.S. and British racism and
imperialism. Stevens deserves praise for her pioneering work, which is
surely a revelation to many North Americans, ignorant of past struggles
in the Caribbean.
Her ground breaking book details how Caribbean Communist parties and
movements challenged the almost overwhelming power and viciousness of
the imperial powers. In addition, Stevens documents how communist
movements were profoundly affected by the rightward shifts of the Stalin
leadership in the Soviet Union.
Stevens weaves a fascinating, but also tragic story, particularly
concerning Haiti, but, there are some missteps in her overall narrative
that I will leave until the end.
EARLY YEARS
Besides Cuba, no other country in the Caribbean has confronted racism
and imperialism. And, as Stevens correctly frames it, overcoming both is
the task of the Caribbean Black working class itself.
For 400 years, the Caribbean was cast into the hell of slavery only to
be replaced by neo-colonialism, capitalist exploitation and racism.
Stevens’ focus is on the resistance organized in the post-WWI period by
the Communist 3rd International of worker’s parties, established in 1919
by Russia’s revolutionary government led by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky.
In the Western hemisphere, the 3rd International was first headquartered
in Mexico City by the Mexican Communist Party, which had united in 1925,
if not before. The MCP contributed toward the unification of the Cuban
communists in 1925; in Haiti in 1930 (others say 1934) and in Puerto
Rico in 1935.
In 1926, the 3rd International moved from Mexico to New York City, under
the guidance of the Communist Party U.S.A (CPUSA). Cuban Communist
Party leader Blas Roca said this about the U.S. party, “The CPUSA was
instrumental in supporting the CP of Puerto Rico upon its inception…just
as it had been for the parties founded in Mexico, Haiti, and Cuba.”
The English speaking islands however, Jamaica, Trinidad-Tobago, the
Bahamas, St. Kitts, and St. Vincent, although shaken by powerful
anti-racist, anti-colonial worker’s struggles, as documented by Stevens,
they did not establish communist parties between WWI and WWII.
Spurred by the Communist International, the US party played an outsized
role in anti-racist campaigns throughout the hemisphere, although
insufficiently in the minds of several Black C.P. leaders, with which
the author agrees.
By 1930, reports indicate, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) had grown to
14,000 members at the start of the global depression, 900 of them Afro
American.
Harlem’s newspapers like the Crusader, Machete and the Emancipator and
organizations like the African Blood Brotherhood contributed mightily to
the ferment of the “Harlem renaissance” and with it a new sense of
identity, from the “Back to Africa” movement of Marcus Garvey to
revolutionary socialism.
Important too was the assistance to the development of the CP’s in
Puerto Rico and Cuba (CPC) by New York’s Spanish Harlem radicals.
Likewise, Haitian communists living in NYC played an outsized role in
developing a Communist movement in Haiti.
In 1931, a catalyzing struggle for these early communist parties, in
addition to the anti-fascist struggle in Spain, was the international
movement to free the “Scottsboro Boys,” nine African American young men
living in Alabama framed-up on racist charges of raping two white women.
Large international protests were organized, in the U.S. but notably
also in the mostly Black Oriente Province of Cuba and Haiti.
Important also was the fight to free the Afro-Cuban, Junco Sandalio, a
prominent Communist labor leader, who bore the nickname, “The Negro
Champion.” Solidarity rallies were also organized by the CP in the U.S.
Once freed, Sandalio was forced to flee to Mexico.
These major campaigns were supported by the influential American Negro
Labor Congress (ANLC), International Labor Defense (ILD), and the
All-American Anti-Imperialist League (AAAIL), all CPUSA aligned or CPUSA
influenced organizations one degree or another.
Within Cuba, says Stevens, the CPUSA’s Black leader James Ford played an
outsized role in the rise of the 1926 Soviet-style Realengo 18 or
Commune 18 in the mostly Black Oriente Province in Cuba and in the 1933
Cuban “revolution.”
In Haiti, a struggle erupted to free Jacques Roumain, a founder of the
Haitian Communist Party and author of the classic Haiti novel, “Masters
of the Dew.” Roumain agitated for Black identity and solidarity with the
Scottsboro boys and was arrested in 1933 in an anti-communist crackdown.
After his release Roumain moved to Paris where he worked with well-known
Cuban communist and poet Nicolas Guillen, Harlem poet Langston Hughes
and Spanish Civil War anti-fascists.
As surprising as it may to some, Haiti once loomed large on the U.S.
Left. Of great importance was opposition to the bloody U.S. Marine
occupation of Haiti (1915-1934). Otto Huiswood, head of the CP USA’s
‘Negro Department’ told organizers, “To mobilize the party …to hold mass
protest meetings and also to demonstrate against the action taken by the
Hoover administration in Haiti.” Stevens observed, “Invoking Haiti as a
site of resistance was strategically necessary precisely because it
doubly exposed the harsh realities of American empire overseas and
racist super-exploitation of black laborers in the U.S. itself.”
In December 1929, Haitian workers stoned U.S. Marines in a multi-day
battle in which five peasants were shot and killed. In response, on Dec.
14, the CPUSA organized an angry mass protest of an estimated 5,000 in
New York’s City Hall plaza against the occupation and the repression of
mass strikes and protests. (See fascinating article http://www.NY
Times.com, 12/15/29).
Among the 17 listed arrested at City Hall was CP leader James Ford.
Among those brutalized by cops was Haitian CPUSA leader Henri Rosemund,
knocked unconscious. Rosemund was perhaps the most prominent political
leader in New York’s big needle trade strike in early 1929. Utilizing
his links between New York’s CP and immigrant communities, Rosemund
mobilized his Haitian base within the Haitian Patriotic Union and the
Anti-Imperialist League to launch a protest of some 5,000 women in Haiti
in opposition to the arrival of a U.S. “Commission” to investigate
“human rights violations.” The protests later grew up to 30,000.
The CPUSA’s “Daily Worker” newspaper loudly proclaimed, “Stand by the
Haitian Revolution!” In the month after the City Hall demo over 100
Haitians joined the CP in New York.
Of great importance for the CPUSA was the concept of a “Black belt”
homeland in the deep U.S. South, a concept promulgated in 1928 by Soviet
leader, Joseph Stalin, four years after the death of USSR leader,
Vladimir Lenin.
A “Black belt” did indeed exist within the former slave-owning U.S.
South, and, according to the CPUSA, it extended into the Caribbean,
encompassing the Black majority in Oriente in eastern Cuba, a region of
militant labor struggles. As Stevens notes, Stalin’s concept was
mechanically adopted as a key demand for Black “self-determination,”
without bothering to consult the U.S. Black masses about their own
liberation, i.e., integrate or live within a separate territory, despite
Northern migration.
Indeed, Oriente was a hotbed. Sugar workers seized control of U.S. sugar
estates several times in 1933 and supported the 1935 General Strike.
Mass deportations of militant Jamaican sugar workers – some known as the
“Red guards” – and Haitian workers began in 1933, with Washington’s
blessing.
ROOSEVELT: THE IMPERIALIST AS A “GOOD NEIGHBOR”
As the author explains, the “Black Belt” was increasingly forgotten as
Stalin’s “Popular Front” strategy lurched rightward following the
triumph of Hitler in 1933. To strategically preserve the endangered
USSR, Stalin and his followers looked to pressure Western so-called
“democracies” and capitalist politicians for aid in thwarting Nazi
aggression. Hardly “democracies” however, the West controlled a
rapacious worldwide imperialist system that included colonies in the
British West Indies and Puerto Rico, as well as vast portions of Africa
and Asia. Of course, Wall Street and the other Western imperialists
cared little for the fate of the world’s first worker’s state.
During the Popular Front years, the CP’s were not merely trying to
pressure “democratic” capitalist governments and dissing revolution, but
supporting, at least initially, capitalist governments themselves in
Cuba (Fulgencio Batista), the Dominican Republic (Rafael Trujillo) and
Haiti (Francois “Papa Doc” Duvalier). Some prominent CP’ers joined
capitalist governments as individuals (“Papa Doc and the TonTon
Macoutes,” Diederich and Burt, 1968).
Cuba’s Batista even praised the CPC in 1939 as, “Promoters of
democracy.” Stevens observed that, “Batista would become the champion of
communists.”
In the U.S., the C.P. embraced the liberal millionaire, President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and his racist Democratic Party – the party
of Southern apartheid! – dubbing it “anti-fascist.” To deter revolution
in the Western Hemisphere FDR announced his “Good Neighbor Policy” in
1933 to distract attention from the bitter memory of dozens of U.S.
backed coups and military occupations, “legitimized” by Washington’s
infamous “Monroe Doctrine” and “Platt Amendment.”
Liberal icon Roosevelt, during the bloody U.S. occupation of Haiti
(1915-34) and the ensuing guerilla war waged by the “Cacos,” was
Assistant Secretary of the Navy, and supported the unobstructed U.S.
rule over Haiti (Stevens) and even going so far as to brag that he wrote
the 1918 Haitian constitution! As President, Roosevelt withdrew from
Haiti in 1934, but only after the murder of thousands of Haitian patriots.
As the book’s author put it, “The CPUSA and Communists across the
Hemisphere were averse to challenging very directly the leadership of
the “Good Neighbors” in the White House and other ruling elites in the
region.”
CHICKENS COME HOME TO ROOST?
By 1935, the Cuban CP backed a “reform” capitalist politician, Grau San
Martin, who supported a “50% law” that sought the chauvinist exclusion
of non-Cubans workers, forcing the emigration of Jamaicans and Haitians
– all with the CPC’s “critical” support. Many Haitians fled to find work
in the sugar fields of what became the ‘killing fields’ of the Dominican
Republic to find work.
The 50% law resulted in a chain of events that led to the horrific mass
murder in 1937 of up to some 14,000 Haitians (Stevens), others say up to
30,000 Haitians.
The U.S. trained, hideously racist, Dominican Republic (DR) dictator,
Rafael Trujillo, ordered a bloodbath of Haitians entering along the
Haiti/Dominican Republic border in 1937. Stevens quotes an Oct. 2 rant
by Trujillo promising to rid the D.R. of, “Dogs, hogs and Haitians.” The
DR’s military, cops and civilian racist goons used bayonets, machetes,
clubs and knives, throwing dead Haitians into piles or into the sea.
Afterwards, “Good Neighbor” Roosevelt and his administration politely
addressed the D.R government butchers by framing the massacre as a
regrettable, i.e., forgettable, “controversy.”
The CPUSA did little in response to the massacre, wrote the author.
Stevens called it, “a retreat from the anti-racist commitments of
yesteryear.”
SOME QUESTIONS
Unfortunately, Stevens cites Grover Furr as a guide to her research, a
Rutgers professor who specializes in white-washing the post-Lenin
dictatorship of Joseph Stalin and his privileged bureaucratic caste. The
Stalin machine murdered the old leadership of the Russian Revolution,
smashed worker’s democracy and betrayed revolution world-wide, including
in the Caribbean. Furr’s contribution, she says, “deeply contributed” to
the book.
Stevens notes Lenin’s passing in the book without assessing its impact
on the politics of the rapidly bureaucratizing post-Lenin regime. The
challenge to Stalin’s reformism represented by the Left Opposition in
the Soviet Union and the creation of the Fourth International in 1938,
led by Leon Trotsky, was not mentioned at all by Stevens – not an accident.
Stevens leaves out all reference to the brilliant Trinidad born
Trotskyist C.L.R. James, who authored, amongst several books and plays,
“The Black Jacobins,” (1938) the widely recognized classic history of
the successful slave revolution in Haiti against the mighty French
empire led by Napoleon Bonaparte. The Haitian revolution, which began in
1791 and triumphed in 1803, had no less a profound impact on world
history, particularly within the racist U.S., than the Cuban revolution
of 1959.
Similarly, Stevens’ impressive mass of information lacks systematic
conclusions, such as on the critical question of whether working class
parties should support for capitalist governments. Was it right, even
given the fascist threat? Readers would likely seek such answers in a
book about revolution. When the worker’s movement supports its class
enemy it always ends in defeat, if not disaster, just as the Caribbean
example, and many others, have shown.
Lastly, I must point out that the book lacked information on the Haitian
guerilla army known as the “Cacos,” led by resistance hero Charlemagne
Peralte, who waged a relentless war on the U.S. Marine occupation until
his murder by a U.S. assassin. Haiti’s armed resistance will forever
remain a precious legacy for all anti-imperialists – no less so than
Vietnam, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Venezuela.
Nevertheless, and despite its serious faults, the “Red International and
Black Caribbean” will remain a source book for anti-imperialists for
years to come. I hope Stevens stays on the case.
Related Articles
Assange: Empire of Surveillance and Imperialism
March 18, 2020
By KATU ARKONADA The trial against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is a
perfect metaphor for how United States imperialism operates in the world
today. The Armed
Book Review: The Trials of Julian Assange
December 2, 2019
By MICHAEL STEVEN SMITH Book Review: In Defense of Julian AssangeEdited
by Tariq Ali and Margaret KuntslerPaperback, First Edition, 320
pagesPublished 2019 by OR Books Whistle-blowing, truth-telling
The SS Winnipeg, Pablo Neruda, and A Long Petal of the Sea
September 25, 2019
By LAZARO MONTEVERDE VARPARAISO, Chile — Not many radicals from the U.S.
know of the Winnipeg and the great poet Pablo Neruda’s role in the
--
___
Steven Pinker
“It's natural to think that living things must be the handiwork of a designer.
But it was also natural to think that the sun went around the earth. Overcoming
naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity's
highest callings.
[Can You Believe in God and Evolution? Time Magazine, August 7, 2005]”
― Steven Pinker