And the book he mentions is on BARD. I read it and it’s excellent.
Miriam
From: Ryan Grim [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] ;
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 10:20 PM
To: miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: The Taliban tried to surrender. The US said no. Now here we are.
Did you know that shortly after the U.S. invaded Afghanistan, the Taliban tried
to surrender? For centuries in Afghanistan, when a rival force had come to
power, the defeated one would surrender and be integrated into the new power
structure -- obviously with much less power, or none at all. That’s how you do
with neighbors you have to continue to live with. This isn’t a football game,
where the teams go to different cities when it’s over. That may be hard for us
to remember, because we haven’t fought a protracted war on our own soil since
the Civil War.
So when the Taliban came to surrender, the U.S. said no way. Only full
annihilation was enough for the Bush administration. They wanted more
terrorists in body bags. The problem was that the Taliban had stopped fighting,
having either fled to Pakistan or put down their weapons and gone back to
civilian life. And Al Qaeda was down to a handful of members.
So how do you kill terrorists if there aren’t any?
Simple: Afghans that the U.S. worked with understood the predicament the
military was in, and so they fabricated bad guys. Score-settling ran amok as
all you had to do to get your neighbor killed or sent to Afghanistan was tell
the U.S. they were Taliban. Doors would be kicked in, no questions asked. The
men left standing built massive fortunes and shipped their wealth to Dubai. “We
are not nation-building again,” Trump said tonight. Well, we never were.
(Unless building highrises with looted cash in Dubai counts.)
After a few years of this, after their surrender efforts were repeatedly
rebuffed, the old Taliban started picking up guns again. When they were driven
from power, the population was happy to see them go. The U.S. managed to make
them popular again.
Liberals spent the 2008 presidential campaign complaining the U.S. had
“ignored” Afghanistan -- when in reality the parts of the country without a
troop presence were the only parts at peace, facing no insurgency against the
Afghan government, such as it was. Then Obama came in and launched a surge in
troop levels while announcing a withdrawal at the same time.
And now Trump says he has a new and better strategy. He says the U.S. needs to
get Pakistan more involved -- except of course Pakistan’s intelligence service
has been propping up the Taliban for decades. Really want them more involved?
The defining book on this war -- one of the top one or two books I’ve ever
read, really -- is called No Good Men Among The Living, by Anand Gopal. It
reads like a novel, but is a nonfiction portrait of three Afghans as they live
through the war -- a civilian woman, a warlord and a Taliban fighter. I don’t
recommend books much, but this one’s just incredible and I can’t recommend it
strongly enough. (You can buy it here; I’ve never met Gopal and have nothing to
do with the book.) I’d say Trump should read it, but it’s longer than a page,
which his advisers say is the max he’ll look at. And the only thing he seems
interested in is the fact that Afghanistan has a bunch of minerals he thinks
the U.S. is owed.
Anyhow, sorry, that was a bit more of a rant than I usually like to send, but
this stupidity is just crazy-making. The idea of more American kids going over
there to put their lives at risk to just make the situation worse, through no
fault of their own, is heartbreaking.
I mean, think about it: we are now losing a war to an enemy that already
surrendered. That’s not easy to do.
Meanwhile, my colleague Jeremy Scahill at The Intercept makes a good pointabout
the underlying endurance of the assassination complex, no matter what Trump
does with troop levels in Afghanistan.
You're getting this email because you either signed up for it or you took a
survey and opted in to this newsletter -- or, probably, you declined to opt
out. Either way, I hope you're enjoying it. I'm the Washington bureau chief at
The Intercept, and I send this several times a week. If you see an ad here,
it's there because sending mass emails turns out to be really expensive. I'm
not making any money off of it; it goes to the email service provider and just
defrays the cost a bit. If you want to contribute directly to help keep the
thing running, you can do so here, though be warned a donation comes with no
tote bags or extra premium content or anything. Or you can buy a copy of Out of
the Ooze: The Story of Dr. Tom Price, the first book put out by Strong Arm
Press, a small progressive publishing house I cofounded.
If somebody forwarded you this note, you can sign up to start getting your own
copy here.
Sent via ActionNetwork.org
<http://click.actionnetwork.org/mpss/c/AgE/ni0YAA/t.2a3/U2PdSzSiR4i6dm3p21mCfw/h8/55uI0ZjpoLA9-2FYhqE-2F4Eitwb7nFGaBM-2BttuyqSTdMS4-3D>
. To update your email address or to stop receiving emails from Bad News,
please
<http://click.actionnetwork.org/mpss/c/AgE/ni0YAA/t.2a3/U2PdSzSiR4i6dm3p21mCfw/h9/WQ-2BlIwq7W2eCmkkcwbDiBfTpRTONPBIO8v6WfDIYEh-2FyZMir5UYWpjCLk08DZOteZDMt2xpAtbC6tq-2BrVTt6IdZcAQj1-2BJbVqKu1ylXYyLmVFcDNeRQkqBa4Ie9aBlMdIKJsa719D0ZPYKzbZbkUTWUEMsxj84VimKQcHDsC0dvF4lyi-2FYIu1uLJfWnOpRYAvckJjIolA0-2F8RNYOw5hn4Q-3D-3D>
click here.
<http://click.actionnetwork.org/mpss/o/AgE/ni0YAA/t.2a3/U2PdSzSiR4i6dm3p21mCfw/o.gif>
