How a Groundswell of Citizen Activism Helped Save the EPA
By Sam Parry, Environmental Defense Fund
27 March 18
Something amazing happened in Washington last week: Congress rejected
Trump's draconian cuts to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's budget
and a host of other critical federal programs. In the end, the president had
no choice but to sign the 2018 federal budget into law.
None of this could have happened without a groundswell of activism - tens of
thousands of citizen petitions and phone calls over the past 13 months,
pounding away on lawmakers. Many of them face tough mid-term elections, and
the political risk of gutting the EPA ultimately proved too great.
It wasn't Congress that ultimately saved the EPA - it was you.
A time to celebrate - and to stay vigilant
My organization alone collected more than 125,000 signatures from people
opposing Trump's plan to slash 30 percent of the agency's budget. Over the
past year, public opinion polls have consistently shown that Americans
support clean air and water safeguards, and that they oppose the idea of a
decimated EPA.
Congress listened and this will mean less pollution, healthier kids and - in
the stark terms of Washington calculations - a greater recognition that
attacking environmental safeguards is bad politics.
It's a genuine moment for celebration - but also a reminder to all of us
that this fight must go on.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is still aggressively pursuing an agenda to
undermine his agency's work.He recently bragged to the Heritage Foundation
that he wants to add hurdles to using sound science at the EPA.
How Congress bucked Trump
Last week's budget showdown isn't going to stop Trump and Pruitt from trying
again. But for now, we can celebrate that Congress:
. added $66 million to the Superfund toxic cleanup program. The Trump
administration wanted to cut it by one-third.
. kept a funding level of $228 million for state and local air quality
management. The administration had requested a reduction of nearly 30
percent.
. maintained last year's funding of $14 million for lead programs in states.
Trump's budget proposed to zero out such grants for states.
. added $12 million in funding to grants fighting water pollution from the
Long Island Sound to Gulf of Mexico and Lake Champlain. Trump had called for
eliminating these grants.
. fully funded the Integrated Risk Information System that Pruitt was
reportedly planning to dismantle. The program supports researchers studying
public health dangers from pollution and chemicals.
. increased U.S. Department of Energy funding for the agency's Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy division from $2.1 billion to $2.3 billion.
The administration had targeted the program, critical to developing a
sustainable energy future, for a 50-percent cut.
It's clear that members of Congress weren't ready to explain to their
constituents why they had voted for more pollution, and instead chose to do
the right thing. I hope Mr. Pruitt, who likes to say his only job is to
implement the will of Congress, is listening now.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner