On 2/21/21, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Julian Assange wins first round against U.S. extradition"Vengeance is mine, thus saieth the..."Lord? Roman Empire? British
https://socialistaction.org/2021/02/20/julian-assange-wins-first-round-against-u-s-extradition/
February 20, 2021
By Nathan Fuller
Almost immediately upon District Judge Vanessa Baraitster’s early
January ruling that WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange would not be
extradited from the United Kingdom to the United States on medical
grounds, lawyers representing the U.S. announced their intent to appeal
that decision. Two days later, Judge Baraitser, whose ruling rejected
Assange’s free speech and democratic rights arguments, denied Assange’s
bail application, meaning he will remain in the freezing cold,
COVID-infected maximum-security Belmarsh prison in London as he waits
for the appeal process to unfold. That process could take weeks, months,
or longer if the U.S. refuses to drop the charges altogether.
Will the U.S. drop the charges?
Despite the prosecution’s declaration of intent to appeal, it’s unclear
how much appetite there is in the U.S. for continuing the prosecution.
The ruling and notice of appeal came in the final days of the Trump
Administration, and the day after the verdict, the U.S.’s outgoing lead
federal prosecutor Zachary Terwilliger told NPR that he wasn’t sure if
the Biden administration would continue to fight for Assange’s extradition.
“It will be very interesting to see what happens with this case,”
Terwilliger said. “There’ll be some decisions to be made. Some of this
does come down to resources and where you’re going to focus your energies.”
President Biden was Vice President when the Obama administration
explicitly decided not to prosecute Assange.
“The problem the department has always had in investigating Julian
Assange is there is no way to prosecute him for publishing information
without the same theory being applied to journalists,” said former
Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller. “And if you are not going
to prosecute journalists for publishing classified information, which
the department is not, then there is no way to prosecute Assange.”
Press freedom organizations and newsrooms agree that the prosecution of
Assange puts all journalists at risk, by criminalizing basic
newsgathering activity as well as the publication of truthful
information in the public interest. “Julian Assange’s Indictment Aims at
the Heart of the First Amendment,” wrote the New York Times editorial
board.
Appealing on Medical Grounds
The U.K.’s lawyers (the Crown Prosecution Service, or CPS) representing
the U.S. confirmed to reporters that the United States officially filed
its intent to appeal the ruling on Friday, January 15. They then have
two weeks to file grounds for appeal, notifying the court of the types
of arguments they intend to raise in their formal appeal.
In her verdict, Judge Baraitser ruled that sending Assange to the U.S.
would violate Section 91 of the U.K.’s 2003 Extradition Act, which bars
extradition if the “physical or mental condition of the person is such
that it would be unjust or oppressive to extradite him.”
Medical experts testified throughout the hearing that Assange has
Asperger’s syndrome, that he has clinical depression, and that his
specific condition and history combined with his prospective treatment
in any U.S. prison all create a dangerously high risk of suicide.
Prison experts testified about the types of conditions Assange would
likely face if he were extradited. The experts agreed that he would
likely be held in solitary confinement, which the U.N. has deemed
psychological torture, that he would get an extremely long prison
sentence, and that he’d be under Special Administrative Measures which
render a prisoner effectively incommunicado, even further isolating him
from his family, friends, and the rest of his support system.
But even without these additional harsh measures Assange could expect,
the mere ordering of his extradition from the U.K. would trigger this
suicide risk. “I am as certain as a psychiatrist ever can be that, in
the event of imminent extradition, Mr. Assange would indeed find a way
to commit suicide,” testified psychiatrist Dr. Michael Kopelman.
The U.S. is expected to attempt to challenge these arguments on appeal.
High Court
Once the U.S. files its grounds for appeal, Assange’s defense team has
10 days to respond to that filing, indicating the ways in which they
will argue against the U.S. submission.
These appeal submissions are then sent to a single U.K. High Court
judge, who makes a determination as to whether to grant permission to
appeal, based on whether that judge feels the grounds are reasonably
arguable. If the judge rules to allow the appeal, the case is then
scheduled to be heard by the High Court, a panel of two judges.
If the high court finally refuses to hear the appeal, which is rare, it
will be the end of the road for the United States and Julian will be
released. However, if the High Court admits the appeal, a date for an
oral hearing will be set.
It is at the High Court stage where Courage Foundation beneficiary Lauri
Love, a U.K. national accused of computer crimes in the U.S.,
successfully defeated an extradition request from the United States. In
Love’s case, which Judge Baraitser referred to in her own ruling, the
District Judge ruled he should be extradited, but on appeal, the High
Court ruled that the United States could not guarantee adequate mental
health care in its prison system and Love, who like Julian has
Asperger’s syndrome, could not be protected from the high risk of suicide.
Potential further appeals
If the case were successfully appealed beyond the High Court, it could
theoretically (though not automatically) be sent up to the U.K.’s
Supreme Court and even higher to the European Court of Human Rights.
While these proceedings take place in the United Kingdom, Assange is
only detained and at risk because of the U.S.’s prosecution, and the new
Justice Department could simply drop the indictment and extradition
request at any time.
To support Assange’s free speech rights and oppose his extradition sign
the petition at Assangedefense.org
(Nathan Fuller is the Executive Director of Assangedefense.org and an
associate of the United Kingdom-based Courage Foundation that defends
whistleblower including Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Julian
Assange.)
Socialist Action News
Sign up for our weekly newsletter:
Your email address
Related Articles
Indian Farmers’ Rise Against Modi Regime
February 20, 2021
By Umar Shahid (The article below by Umar Shahid is an update on the
historic January 26 mobilizations in India against the neoliberal
policies of
As Biden returns “civilization” to Washington…Capitalism Cannot Be Reformed
February 9, 2021
By Jeff Mackler Capitalist “civilization” returned to the nation’s
capitol on Jan. 20, Joseph Biden’s Inauguration Day. Replete with 25,000
troops forming an iron ring
The Truth About Recycling Plastics
February 9, 2021
By Paul Goettlich We’re told that a world without plastics is impossible
to imagine. But 70 years ago, I lived with almost none of it.
--
Emmett F. Fields “ Atheism is more than just the knowledge that gods do
not exist, and that religion is either a mistake or a fraud. Atheism is
an attitude, a frame of mind that looks at the world objectively,
fearlessly, always trying to understand all things as a part of nature.
” ― Emmett F. Fields