Massive Secret UK Propaganda Campaign in Former Soviet Republics Seeds Contempt
From the Skripal affair to Navalny’s rise to the Russian Olympic doping
scandal, these damning revelations should be enough to dispel any notions of
truth in what the UK and allies tell their citizens through mainstream media
outlets and the social media landscape they control.
by Raul Diego
March 09th, 2021
By Raul Diego
LONDON — Standing against the scorching blue backdrop at the EU podium in late
2017, then British Prime Minister Theresa May mendaciously promised to “counter
[Russian] disinformation” in all the former Soviet republics of Eastern Europe,
Eurasia and the Baltics by pledging €110 Million ($130 Million) over five years
to fight the Kremlin’s influence in the region.
A massive data leak published by the Anonymous hacktivist group this past
February has revealed how some of that money was used to create and disseminate
disinformation, alternate narratives and effectuate the outright manipulation
of media by the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) through
a number of partnerships with stalwart disinformation outfits like Bellingcat,
established information warfare specialist firms like the Zinc Network among
dozens more that were working in secret with the governmental entity
responsible for promoting British interests around the world.
After Years of Propaganda, American Views of Russia and China Hit Historic Lows
A new Gallup poll finds that US public opinion on China has crashed to all-time
lows with only 20% of Americans holding favorable views of China.
MintPress News | Alan Macleod | Mar 1
Several different operations dedicated to a specific region or country have
been discovered so far, as reporters sift through the trove of documents.
Highly sophisticated and disturbingly insidious propaganda campaigns to
influence society, mold perceptions about Russia, and affect political outcomes
were carried out by teams of Western media organizations, consultants, paid
assets, and operatives from the Baltics to the shores of the Mediterranean.
The Open Information Partnership (OIP), as one of these far-reaching operations
is named, received funding from the FCDO, according to RT, of at least £10
Million and was comprised of 44 partners, among which the aforementioned
Bellingcat and Zinc, were joined by the Atlantic Council’s DFRLab and
London-based NGO Media Diversity Institute and others.
signed contract between Albany Associates and British foreign office
A signed contract between info broker Albany Associates and the British foreign
office
Billed as a “diverse network of organisations and individuals united in our
determination to expose and counter disinformation,” OIP’s partners had their
agents strewn across Central and Eastern Europe to deliver on the scope of work
delineated in its contracts with the FCDO, which would determine what locations
to target at any given moment.
North Macedonia was selected early on and Zinc initiated the operation by
identifying the largest media outlet in the country, MOST Network. The
information warfare outfit and OIP partners approached DFRLab and Bellingcat to
offer a two-week course on “cyber security training, mentoring on digital
forensics, open source investigation and media ethics.” Although the documents
don’t provide specific dates, it is inferred that the 2019 election in North
Macedonia was what moved the FCDO to prioritize it at that time, given the
choice between pro-EU and pro-Russia candidates.
Subversion in the Baltics
A recent RT exposé revealed disinformation efforts by the UK that predate May’s
speech by at least a year, targeting ethnic Russians in Estonia, Latvia, and
Lithuania. A 2016 request for proposal issued by the FCDO seeks contractors to
“provide overt innovative soft power interventions that will foster better
links between the United Kingdom and individuals in the Baltic States whose
primary language is Russian.”
Twitter Deletes Dozens of Russian Accounts for “Undermining Faith in NATO”
Twitter announced it has deleted 373 accounts it claims were linked to Russia,
Iran, and Armenia for “undermining faith in the NATO."
MintPress News | Alan Macleod | Feb 24
Ethnic Russians who live in the three Baltic countries compose about one-sixth
of the region’s population. Estonia and Latvia never afforded them full
citizenship after the collapse of the Soviet Union, rendering a full two-thirds
of them “effectively stateless.” The document profiles the older generation of
this particular demographic and warns its prospective partners that changing
their attitudes might prove more difficult than it is worth. Instead, the FCDO
suggests going after younger Russophones, given their “medium-high awareness,
knowledge and interest of Euro-Atlantic narratives and ‘culture’” which “may
make them more open to alternative narratives” and thus “less vulnerable to
Russian propaganda.”
The extent to which Western propaganda mercenaries were willing to go in order
to infiltrate Baltic cultural idiosyncrasies is made evident by one of the
FCDO’s partners, Albany Associates, which has worked with the UK before,
targeting children in Syria. Leveraging its track record of subverting young
minds, Albany made a number of propositions in response to the FCDO’s request,
including using the sons and daughters of the older ethnic Russians in the
Baltics to “amplify a distinct “Euro-Baltic” identity.”
Anon Leak UK
Leaked documents reveal Albany’s research into how the UK could best flex its
soft power in the Baltics
This would be accomplished by organizing a number of outreach activities,
social media amplification strategies, and generally, “ideas and concepts of
cultural outreach and strategic communications derived from methodological
innovations proven in other relevant and/or similar contexts”.
Facebook would be used to “disseminate information on Baltic Euro-leaning
heritage, advertise, aggregate and amplify the activities and media content”
and “key dates and events of significance to Russian speakers, such as WWII
celebrations” would be exploited to deliver distinctly anti-Russian sentiment.
All of these tactics would be expanded as the operation grew and incorporated
other FCDO partners like Zinc, which offered “clandestine support” to people in
the Baltic states who could be used to hone the propagandists’ reach.
Essentially creating “influencers” by teaching them how to “develop, pitch and
place articles with national and international media outlets” as well as
receive training in digital marketing for their “chosen social media platform.”
Leave our grandparents alone
The breadth and scope of these operations are not limited to the spread of
alternative narratives, however. A separate document from the FCDO disclosed
the desire to dig deep into the psychological makeup of the ethnic Russians in
the Baltics, seeking to fund research into the “socio-cultural background of
individuals and their general perceptions and attitudes, and specifically their
attitudes towards the UK and the West” for the benefit of British policymakers.
The document lists the main themes that this research should comprise,
including “satisfaction with government, attitudes towards life and attitudes
towards the future.” The FCDO wished to pinpoint their “current life
motivations and desires” and “key interests,” such as hobbies; Insight into
their “biggest fears” and how they interact with the media they are exposed to.
Such granular levels of information could only be dreamed of by Allen Dulles
and the CIA’s disinformation efforts behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold
War. But, today, our digitally-integrated world allows for such dystopian
dreams to become a reality. At the same time, it makes exposing these
operations that much easier.
From the Skripal affair to Navalny’s rise to the Russian Olympic doping
scandal, all of which occurred after May’s speech in Brussels where she pledged
to “call out hostile Russia,” these damning revelations about a concerted and
continuous effort by a major Atlanticist power to seed unfavorable narratives
through co-option and subversion against an enemy state should be enough to
dispel any notions of truth in what the UK and allies like the United States
tell its own citizens through its mainstream media outlets and the social media
landscape it controls.
As independent, critical thinkers, instead of approaching media from the
standpoint of fleshing out “fake news” through compromised fact-checking
organizations or popular influencers, we might be better served by assuming
everything we see and hear over these channels and platforms is an attempt to
manipulate us with half-truths and skewed interpretations. It is up to us to
trust our own ability to find out what is true and what is not and leave our
grandpa out of it.
Feature photo | A young Lithuanian boy holds a US soldier’s