[blind-democracy] Media and people

  • From: "Bob" <ebob824@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@freelists.org>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:19:07 +0200


As Egypt's coup chief and incumbent ruler, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi prepares for ludicrous election, he presides an unprecedented crackdown on mass and private media. It is the primal method of conveying tidings to the public. However, authoritarian regimes may misuse media to their own advantage. Here in Egypt, and as of Sisi's comical reelection approaches, media is designated to counterfeitly boost for Sisi as a national rescuer while simultaneously, relegating even the thought of having potential rivals. This is the prominent threat of the media being at the hand of governmental authorities. Media is suppose to be impartial and nonjudgmental. In major ways, state governments have nobbled the impact of media to tactically modulate public opinion. Media followers are often driven by a secondary source of information. Therefore, it is difficult for them to excogitate independent convictions. When Donald Trump ran for president, he used media and public rhetoric to sternly steer and mislead lay citizens. Islamophobia pro exponents here and elsewhere use media to advocate for their toxically detestable notions. Southern evangelists are in favour of Zionist media. Americanism is primarily based on press dominance. Common citizens are prejudiced because of what media tells them. Media has its pros and cons. If it is based on autonomous tenets, it will be a substantial source for people to freely opine their opinions. Nevertheless, it is a minacious situation, as to when the government manipulates what appears and disappears from the media. The BBC is absolutely my favourite broadcast. Although it's mainly funded by the British government, I never felt it takes a particular direction for the sake of its financial provider. They cover world events unbiasedly and discuss different subjects objectively. In addition, I like their educational podcasts. The BBC website for English learners is filled with a wide range of educational programs, all of which are fascinating, entertaining, useful and totally free to download. However, American educational programs are not as competent as the ones of the BBC. The BBC educational programs are plainly produced to promote the eloquence of properly spoken English. However, American educational programs are somewhat philistine, they circuitously attempt to manipulate listeners, to gradually americanise their perspective. This is why, I consider listening to most of media sources nothing but a waste of time. Egyptian media is perfectly controled by coup executives and secularists. Throughout his damnably quadrennial period, Sisi managed to expand the strength of hypocrisy and completely abolished Azhar role. And to fend for freedom, he jailed a singer for just telling a Nile joke. Despite his anti free speech policies, he is backed by the United States because of his alleged war on terror, the one of which he never won. Americanism is pretty good at developing and maintaining totalitarianism in our region. As it copes with their interest, it will never be disposed. This is why, they relentlessly deploy military forces in Syria. One day, the table shall be reversed. We already began to see signs of game reversal, as conflict erupts between oval office and other organisations therein.
Bob

__________________

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Other related posts: