Truthdig
Spurned Reporters Should Dump Trump Briefings and Turn to Investigative
Journalism
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/spurned_reporters_dump_trump_briefings_i
nvestigative_journalism_20170227/
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to More1
Posted on Feb 26, 2017
By Juan Cole (http://www.truthdig.com/staff/juan_cole) / Informed Comment
(http://www.juancole.com/2017/02/reporters-investigative-journalism.html)
Donald Trump was unhappy Saturday that the major media had neglected to
report a point made by Herman Cain in an interview on Fox. Cain alleged
that in Barack Obama's first month, the Federal budget deficit rose $200
bn., but in Trump's first month it fell to only $12 bn. Obviously, Obama
had nothing to do with the deficit in his first month- that was a result of
the 2008 collapse, which had something to do with Republican policies of
deregulating the banks and other mortgage lenders and declining to exercise
any oversight over sketchy practices. And Trump had nothing to do with the
deficit
(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-trumps-tweet-about-the-deficit-is-so-s
illy-2017-02-25 ) during his first month in office. That was a result of
Obama's 8 years of pulling the economy back out of the toilet to which the
Republican Party had consigned it.
Trump's petty attacks on journalists as enemies of America, as the worst
people, and as irrationally denying him the credit for his 4 weeks of
economic turnaround, are deeply worrisome to many Americans sensitive to the
danger of a spiral down into authoritarian rule. William H. McRaven,
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/02/23/greatest-threa
t-to-democracy-commander-of-bin-laden-raid-slams-trumps-anti-media-sentiment
/?postshare=9741487911502388&tid=ss_tw ) the retired four-star admiral and
former Navy Seal who led the raid against Usama Bin Laden, called Trump's
remark on the press as an enemy of the people "the greatest threat to
democracy" he has ever seen.
Trump's immature sidelining of reporters on his enemy's list kept rolling on
this weekend. White House spokesman Sean Spicer was set to do an on-camera
press briefing on Friday, and then Donald Trump spoke at the conservative
gathering CPAC. It is a custom that the spokesman doesn't do an on-camera
event the same day the president gives a substantial address. So Spicer
switched to doing what is called a "gaggle," a smaller briefing in his
office attended only be a few reporters in a pool who then would convey his
remarks to others.
Spicer pared down the invitee list
(http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39088770 ;) to the bare bones. He
excluded the BBC, CNN, the New York Times, the Guardian, the Los Angeles
Times, Buzzfeed, the Daily Mail and Politico, among others. He allowed ABC,
Fox News, Breitbart News, Reuters and the Washington Times. Breitbart is
not a news outlet, but a propaganda arm of elements of the Ku Klux Klan who
wear suits rather than white robes.
The exclusions were so egregious and petty that the Associated Press, USA
Today and Time magazine declined to be present. The Washington Post and
McClatchy did not know about the disinvitees, and said that if they had been
aware of what was going on, they would not have attended, either.
Since Spicer often conveys fake news (the Atlanta Attack) or pro-Trump
propaganda at his briefings, it isn't clear that the excluded media were
exactly missing anything.
Then Trump announced (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39093434 ;)
that he would be the first president since Tricky Dick Nixon voluntarily to
skip the annual dinner of the White House correspondents, where in recent
decades the president and the press engaged in some good-natured ribbing.
Trump appears to have felt humiliated at one of these events by remarks of
then President Barack Obama, pushing back against Trump's outrageous lies
about Obama's birthplace.
But Spicer's and Trump's attempts to exclude so many journalists from a
briefing may be all to the good.
Something is broken in American journalism. Maybe it is the "inverted
pyramid" whereby US reporters put the "most important thing" first in the
article. It has been pointed out that this way of organizing the article
gives an unfair advantage to a duplicitous administration, since anything
the president says goes first in the article. Bush and his people used this
principle to game the press all the time. (When the scandal about US
personnel torturing prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq broke on a Thursday
evening, Bush quickly came out and condemned the practice. The Friday
headlines were "President condemns torture at Abu Ghraib.")
Or maybe it is access journalism, whereby an administration adopts a few
favored writers and feeds them scoops that it suits the administration to go
on the front page.
Or maybe it is the news conference. Why privilege an administration's
narrative about itself by doing articles based on nothing more than hot air
coming from the general direction of the West Wing?
Most major newspapers in the US, when there were major print newspapers,
used to have an investigative journalism team. With the decline of ad
revenue and the hard times on which journalism has fallen, investigative
journalism has often been abandoned. Administrations and the Washington
bureaucracy don't like a young journalist nosing around. ProPublica, the
Bureau of Investigative Journalism, and some other independent organizations
(often with limited resources) have been left to try to fill the gap left
when big media cut back on investigative reporting.
But we need that back, big time, in this administration. Everywhere you dig
in Trump's cabinet, you find bodies. So instead of sitting in a room being
fed falsehoods by Spicer or Trump, best for the journalists to be working
contacts in the White House or at NSC or the Pentagon to get the real story.
Enough people in Washington are appalled by the Trump-Bannon attempt to
fascize America that they seem willing to leak damaging information all on
their own. How much better if a trained journalist got those stories
through initiative.
So here's to Trump excluding virtually all the newspapers and cable
channels. Let him. Go get the scoops he doesn't want you to have.
Someone (probably not George Orwell) once said, "News is something somebody
doesn't want printed; all else is advertising." Whoever said it, truer
words were never spoken.
We need less advertising (or "public relations" in some versions), and a
helluva lot more journalism these days.
Trump's War on Immigrants Has Already Reached the Supreme Court
4 3 2 1
John Oliver Looks Into the Worst and Best of Obamacare (Video)
Would Trump Let Oscar Winner Mahershala Ali Back Into the Country? (Video)
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
C 2017 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
Signup for Truthdig's newsletter