William Blum
The Anti-Empire Report #150
By William Blum - Published August 25th, 2017
Share
27
I’m back
It has recently been reported that Senator John McCain has an aggressive
brain tumor. Not long ago I would have thought: “Good. It’ll be great to
be rid of that neanderthal reactionary bastard!”
Not now. My kidneys are gone and I’m on (rather unpleasant) dialysis for
the rest of my life. My separated-from German wife is in Germany and can’t
fly because of the danger of blood clots forming and lodging in her lungs or
heart. I’m an avid reader of medical news and almost every day I get
choked-up and depressed by the never-ending heart-breaking stories of
incurable pain and suffering of the old and the young.
So I wish the senator a good recovery, if that’s possible. Probably no more
possible than his politics recovering. He just condemned all the neo-Nazi
actions in Charlottesville, this man who went out of his way to pose for
friendly photos with neo-Nazis in Ukraine and jihadists in Syria.
So far the dialysis does not seem to have helped, at least not with my two
main symptoms: deep-seated sleepiness at home, resulting in repeated naps,
making my writing difficult; and getting out-of-breath and having to stop
and rest after a very short and slow walk outdoors. I’m curious about
whether any of my readers knows of anyone with a medical problem that was
clearly relieved by dialysis. It may be my advanced age of 84 that blocks
any improvement. But, supposedly, the dialysis keeps me alive in the absence
of functioning kidneys. Incidentally, nine of my readers and friends have
offered me a kidney for transplant, but I can’t find a hospital willing to
perform it; again it’s my age, though I’m very willing.
At least I still have my eyesight and my hearing. My mind is okay. I have
all my limbs and am not paralyzed. And I’m not in pain. Much to be thankful
for.
It’s also very nice to have gone past the hangups my condition thrust upon
me and to be back writing my report for the first time in five months.
During the recent American presidential campaign I wrote that if I were
forced to vote and also forced to choose between Clinton and Trump I’d vote
for the Donald. (As it turned out I voted for the Green Party candidate,
Jill Stein.) I stated two reasons why I’d choose Trump over Clinton:
presumably, a lesser chance of nuclear war with Russia and a lesser chance
of the American government closing down the Russian TV station, Russia Today
(RT), broadcasting in the US. There was at the time, and now again, growing
Congressional pressure to do just that and I’m very reliant on the station.
Because of such matters I was willing to overlook Trump’s many and obvious
character defects, which I summed up with the endearing word of my people
back in Brooklyn -- “shmuck”. But by now the man’s shmuckiness has been
writ so large that little hope for him can be maintained.
What is keeping Donald Trump from drowning in the very cesspool of his own
shmuckiness is a gentleman named Kim Jong-un. Who would have believed that a
single historical period could produce two such giant shmucks, men who tower
over their pathetic contemporaries? There’s only one explanation for this
remarkable phenomenon. Of course. It’s Russia. Moscow is using the two men
to make America look foolish. And Russia, it may soon be revealed, gave
North Korea its nuclear weapons. Did you think that such an impoverished,
downtrodden society could produce such scientific marvels on its own?
Is there any act too dastardly for Vladimir Putin?
We don’t know yet whether Trump’s son, daughter or son-in-law made any
deals with Kim Jong-un. Stay tuned to Fox News and CNN.
Those stations, amongst others, put out a lot of fake news, but when it
comes to news of North Korea nothing compares to the fake news of 1950. Did
you know there’s no convincing evidence that North Korea did what they’re
most famous for -- the June 25, 1950 invasion of South Korea, which led to
the everlasting division of the Korean peninsula into two countries? And
there were no United Nations forces that observed this invasion, as we’ve
been taught. In any event, the two sides had been clashing across the
dividing line for several years. What happened on that fateful day in June
could thus be regarded as no more than the escalation of an ongoing civil
war. Read my chapter on Korea in Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA
Interventions Since World War II for the full details of these and other
myths.
The response to terrorism
I still get emails criticizing me for the stand I took against Islamic
terrorists earlier this year. Almost every one feels obliged to remind me
that the terrorists are acting in revenge for decades of US/Western bombing
of Muslim populations and assorted other atrocities. And I then have to
inform each one of them that they’ve chosen the wrong person for such a
lecture. I, it happens, wrote the fucking book on the subject!
In the first edition of my book Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only
Superpower, published in 2001, before September 11, the first chapter was
“Why do terrorists keep picking on The United States?” It includes a long
list of hostile US military and political actions against the Islamic world
during the previous 20 years.
So I can well see why radical Muslims would harbor a deep-seated desire for
revenge against The United States and its allies who often contributed to
the hostile actions. My problem is that the Islamic terrorist actions are
seldom aimed at those responsible for this awful history -- the executive
and military branches of the Western nations, but are more and more targeted
against innocent civilians, which at times includes other Muslims, probably
even, on occasion, some who sympathize with the radical Islamic cause. These
random terrorist acts are thus not defendable or understandable from any
revenge point of view. What did the poor people of Barcelona have to do with
Western imperialism?
Civilians are of course much easier to target, but that’s clearly no
excuse. As I’ve pointed out in the past, we should consider this: From the
1950s to the 1980s the United States carried out all kinds of very harmful
policies against Latin America, including numerous bombings, without the
natives ever resorting to the uncivilized, barbaric kind of retaliation as
employed by ISIS. Latin American leftists generally took their revenge out
upon concrete representatives of the American empire: diplomatic, military
and corporate targets - not markets, theatres, nightclubs, hospitals,
schools, restaurants or churches.
The terrorists’ choice of targets is bad enough, but their methods are even
worse. Who could have imagined 20 years ago that an organization would exist
in this world that would widely publicize detailed instructions on how to
choose a truck to drive down a busy thoroughfare and directly into crowds of
people? What species of human being is this?
What is needed is a worldwide media campaign to make fun of the very idea
that such men, along with suicide bombers, will be rewarded by Allah in an
afterlife; even the idea of an afterlife can of course be derided; yes, even
the idea of Allah, by that or any other name, can be derided; at least the
idea of such a cruel God. Appealing to jihadists on simply moral grounds
would be even more useless than appealing to Pentagon officials or Donald
Trump on moral grounds. The jihadists have to be deeply ridiculed; the small
amount of human empathy and decency still remaining in their heart of hearts
has to be reached through embarrassing them before their friends and family.
Femmes fatales can be used against young Islamic men, most of whom, I’d
venture to say, have sizable sexual hangups. Bombing them only increases
their numbers.
Some thoughts on the question that will not go away: Capitalism vs.
socialism
“The whole art of Conservative politics in the 20th century is being
deployed to enable wealth to persuade poverty to use its political freedom
to keep wealth in power.” -- Aneurin Bevan (1897-1960), Labour Party (UK)
minister
The fact that Donald J. Trump is a champion -- indeed, a model, or as he
might say, a huge model -- of capitalism should be enough to make people
turn away from the system, but the debate between capitalism and socialism
continues without pause in the Trump era as it has since the 19th century.
The wealth gap, affordable housing, free education, public transportation, a
sustainable environment, and health care are some of the perennial points of
argument we’re all familiar with.
So many empty houses … so many homeless people -- Is this the way a market
economy is supposed to work?
Twice in recent times the federal government in Washington has undertaken
major studies of many thousands of federal jobs to determine whether they
could be done more efficiently by private contractors. On one occasion the
federal employees won more than 80% of the time; on the other occasion 91%.
Both studies took place under the George W. Bush administration, which was
hoping for different results. 1 The American people have to be reminded of
what they once knew but seem to have forgotten: that they don’t want BIG
government, or SMALL government; they don’t want MORE government, or LESS
government; they want government ON THEIR SIDE.
As to corporations, we have to ask: Do the members of a family relate to
each other on the basis of self-interest and greed?
Speaking in very broad terms … slavery gave way to feudalism … feudalism
gave way to capitalism … capitalism is not a timelessly valid institution
but was created to satisfy certain needs of the time … capitalism has
outlived its usefulness and must now give way to socialism … the ultimate
incompatibility between capitalist profit motive and human environmental
survival demands nothing less.
The system corrupts every important aspect of our lives, including the one
which takes up the most of our time -- our work, even for corporation
executives, who demand huge salaries and benefits to justify their working
at jobs that otherwise are not particularly satisfying. Several years ago,
the Financial Times of London reported on Wall Street’s opposition to
salary limits:
Senior bankers were quick to warn the plans would cause a brain drain from
the profession as top executives seek more rewarding jobs out of the public
eye. Unlike other careers where job satisfaction and other considerations
play a part, finance tends to attract people whose main motivation is money.
… ‘The cap is a lousy idea,’ complained one top Wall Street executive.
‘If there is no monetary upside, who would want to do these jobs?’ 2
As for those below the executive class … When they work, it’s too often
just any job they can find, rather than one designed to realize innermost
spiritual or artistic needs. Their innermost needs are rent, food, clothes,
and electricity.
For those concerned about the extent of freedom under socialism the jury is
still out because the United States and other capitalist powers have
subverted, destabilized, invaded, and/or overthrown every halfway serious
attempt at socialism in the world. Not one socialist-oriented government,
from Cuba and Vietnam in the 1960s, to Nicaragua and Chile in the 1970s, to
Bulgaria and Yugoslavia in the 1990s, to Haiti and Venezuela in the 2000s
has been allowed to rise or fall based on its own merits or lack of same, or
allowed to relax its guard against the ever-threatening imperialists.
The demise of the Soviet Union (even with all its shortcomings) has turned
out to be the greatest setback to the fight against the capitalist behemoth,
and we have not yet recovered.
How could the current distribution of property and wealth reasonably be
expected to emerge from any sort of truly democratic process? And if this is
the way regulated capitalism works, what would life under unregulated
capitalism be like? We’ve long known the answer to that question. Theodore
Roosevelt (president of the United States 1901-09) said in a speech in 1912:
“The limitation of governmental powers, of governmental action, means the
enslavement of the people by the great corporations who can only be held in
check through the extension of governmental power.”
And what do the corporate elite want? In a word: “everything” … from our
schools to our social security, from our health care to outer space, from
our media to our sports.
“We are all ready to be savage in some cause. The difference between a good
man and a bad one is the choice of the cause.” - William James (1842-1910)
A few years ago, when George W. Bush came out as a painter, he said that he
had told his art teacher that “there’s a Rembrandt trapped inside this
body”. 3 Ah, so Georgie is more than just a painter. He’s an artiste.
And we all know that artistes are very special people.
They’re never to be confused with mass murderers, war criminals, merciless
torturers or inveterate liars.
Neither are they ever to be accused of dullness of wit or incoherence of
thought or speech.
Artistes are not the only special people.
Devout people are also special: Josef Stalin studied for the priesthood.
Osama bin Laden prayed five times a day.
And animal lovers: Herman Goering, while his Luftwaffe rained death upon
Europe, kept a sign in his office that read: “He who tortures animals
wounds the feelings of the German people.”
Adolf Hitler was also an animal lover and had long periods of being a
vegetarian and anti-smoking.
Charles Manson was a staunch anti-vivisectionist.
And cultured people: This fact Elie Wiesel called the greatest discovery of
the war: that Adolf Eichmann was cultured, read deeply, played the violin.
Mussolini also played the violin.
Some Nazi concentration camp commanders listened to Mozart to drown out the
cries of the inmates.
Former Bosnian Serb politician Radovan Karadzic, convicted by the
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia for war crimes,
genocide, and crimes against humanity, was a psychiatrist, specializing in
depression; a practitioner of alternative medicine; published a book of
poetry and books for children.
Members of ISIS and Al Qaeda and other suicide bombers are genuinely and
sincerely convinced that they are doing the right thing, for which they will
be honored and rewarded in an afterlife. That doesn’t make them less evil;
in fact it makes them more terrifying, since they force us to face the scary
reality of a world in which sincerity and morality do not necessarily have
anything to do with each other.
Dick Gregory, 1932-2017
“Mayor Daley and other government officials during the riots of the ’60s
showed their preference for property over humanity by ordering the police to
shoot all looters to kill. They never said shoot murderers to kill or shoot
dope pushers to kill.”
“When the white Christian missionaries went to Africa, the white folks had
the bibles and the natives had the land. When the missionaries pulled out,
they had the land and the natives had the bibles.”
“The way Americans seem to think today, about the only way to end hunger in
America would be for Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird to go on national TV
and say we are falling behind the Russians in feeding folks.”
“What we’re doing in Vietnam is using the black man to kill the yellow man
so the white man can keep the land he took from the red man.”
Share
27
Notes
1.Washington Post, June 8, 2005 and March 23, 2006
2.Financial Times (London) February 5, 2009
3.Washington Post, November 21, 2013
Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission, provided
attribution to William Blum as author and a link to williamblum.org is
provided.
← Issue #149
.
Books
The Anti-Empire Report
Essays and Speeches
About the Author
Browse the Anti-Empire Report by year 2017 Reports2016 Reports2015
Reports2014 Reports2013 Reports2012 Reports2011 Reports2010 Reports2009
Reports2008 Reports2007 Reports2006 Reports2005 Reports2004 Reports2003
Reports
William Blum is an author, historian, and U.S. foreign policy critic. He is
the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World
War II and Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower, among
others.