Mistafa: Unprovable or unproven basic assumption.
Richard
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2019, at 6:02 AM, Mostafa Almahdy <mostafa.almahdy@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As we know, the universe couldn't be purposeless. Thence, the concept
of the divine preexisted the provenience of human race. The claim that
man created the concept of God is immensely delusional. Atheists
deliberately dispose theistic rational argument. I don't need to enter
into another useless debate. At the same time, I don't like fools to
think I fled. Here's a basically structured logical argument,
featuring the existence of the universe. Premiss one, everything that
begins to exist has a cause. Premiss two, the universe began to exist.
Conclusion, the universe has a cause. Roger falsely calls this stiffly
logical chronology (circular reasoning). I don't need to debate an
arbitrary arguer. Roger doesn't like rational evidence. He
intentionally dismisses them and fallaciously devotes himself to
empirical effrontery. He is irreverently fanatic. It's truly a waste
of time to converse with this arrogantly stubborn guy. There is
multiplicity of decisive evidence that are necessarily resolving the
existence of the divine. They incessantly proliferate as time passes
on. Atheists collectively are minor to cosmological evidence for God's
existence. Psychically, faith and reason meant to align. Atheism
destroys human apprehension. Fortunately, I met and spoke to locally
unconscious onomatopoeical Atheists. They unconsciously mimic their
western mentors. Atheism justifies irrationality and calls for
iniquity. Atheists are callously conscienceless. With even calculus
evidence, God's existence could possibly be proven. What brought us to
this point though? I was talking about the teen Saudi girl who had
been taken advantage of. As usual, Roger, this imprecisely rabid
Atheist, has coerced the God debate into the initial discussion. Why?
Because he has enormous antipathy of faith and believers. He's utterly
wrapped with intemperate nescience and discourtesy. He's therefore to
be portrayed the Donald Trump of this list. Accordingly, I justly
marked all of his direct threads to me to automatically be delivered
to the trash folder. I do not need to waste my time pointlessly
debating a senior dormant of the United States. He won't ever be
convinced unless he ultimately dies and faces his awful destiny. He
truly resembles trump's supercilious rhetoric. This is me, from a
third world nation, telling a citizen of the United States, you're
radically stupefied. You pretend you're educated but you're not. I do
not like what I just wrote. Roger forced me to do so. I obviously am
not convincing anyone here. I have no problem with this. I just would
like us to be sanely accountable and adhere the main point of the
subject. I, without any constitutional rights of any nation in the
world, have the fully reserved right to criticise the secular and
atheistic west because it furiously attempts to manipulate our culture
and identity. This war is essentially based on thoughts and
convictions. The west funds depraved people, particularly
secularists to systematically denigrate faith and cause cultural
chaos. They regularly appear in major broadcasts to gradually
disinform lay locals. I stand firm in this cultural combat. We won't
allow those who're bribed to do what westerns want. They criminally
wish to secularise our identity and ruin our heritage. They
erroneously assume they could reach up to that acrimonious objective.
However, they inshAllah won't ever prosper. I'm done with this piece.
I hope everyone clearly discerns who am I. I don't hate others as long
as they stay away from attempting to change us or manipulate the way
we live. I do not ask you to embrace my lifestyle. At the same time,
any attempt to manipulate or regulate our way of life, despite your
opinion of it is despised and declined. Is this plain? I hope so.
On 1/29/19, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems that we are back to the childish insults. I actually kind of
like that. Every time I back you into a logic corner and you have no
response to my points you start throwing the insults and throwing
tantrums. That validates my position. For yourself, though, you are
doing a disservice. When you have no refutation for my points that must
mean that you are wrong. That is the time that for your own sake you
should change your mind and allow yourself to grow, to grow
intellectually. Throwing tantrums and insults are not going to help you
to learn anything.
________________________________________________
Jules Verne
“ Reality provides us with facts so romantic that imagination itself could
add nothing to them. ”
― Jules Verne
On 1/29/2019 12:34 PM, Mostafa Almahdy wrote:
You live infelicitous and will die in misery. You somewhat consider
yourself vainglorious. Nevertheless, you are inglorious and just an
abject senior of the US. you're worthy of nothing but contempt. I have
marked your messages to appear only in my trash. That way, the subject
is matching with its essence.
On 1/29/19, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote:
And how do you know that to be true, Mostafa? Please provide an answer
that has something to do with it being true.
________________________________________________
Jules Verne
“ Reality provides us with facts so romantic that imagination itself
could
add nothing to them. ”
― Jules Verne
On 1/28/2019 10:13 PM, Mostafa Almahdy wrote:
Roger is despicable and destined to eternal perdition.
On 1/29/19, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote:
My response is that this points up more of the hideous nature of
religion,
this contempt for the rights of women. It is despicable. Religion is
despicable.
________________________________________________
Jules Verne
“ Reality provides us with facts so romantic that imagination itself
could
add nothing to them. ”
― Jules Verne
On 1/28/2019 8:18 PM, Mostafa Almahdy wrote:
Hello everyone, I hope you are keeping really well. This is me,
Mustafa Almahdy from Cairo Egypt. I am a certified Azharian
theologian. At almost the middle of this month, we've seen a story
that has sparked mass attention in major news broadcasts. It's the
ridiculous story of indoctrinated teenaged Saudi female called Rahaf
Al qanun. In each and every family anywhere in the world, there might
be miscommunication between parents and children. Rahaf fled her
family and allowed aliens to unlawfully intervene between her and her
family. She fled her family in Bangkok's International Airport.
Therein, she used social media to forge a predicament. Subsequently,
she left the airport of Bangkok under UN care. She was being headed
to
Austrailia. For some reason though, Canada granted the faker teen the
status of asylum. At her glorious arrival to Toronto's international
airport, the Canadian foreign minister, Chrystia Freeland was there
at
her reception. I include the Canadian foreign minister along with the
prime minister, Justin Trudeau among the recipients of this piece.
Therefore, contact information is undisclosed. Now, to both, mr
Trudeau and his foreign minister, why would you unethically spoof a
teenaged girl into a viciously political game? She's been taken
advantage of. We knew that Saudi expelled your ambassador and
suspended upcoming investment transactions for illicitly attempting
to
interfere in the kingdom's domestic affairs. Thereof, Canada's
government wickedly vitiated the situation of Rahaf to somewhat
dramatise the currently heightening tense between the two countries.
Nevertheless, the Canadian government must concede to the fact that
it
attempts to secularise Muslims societies in the counterfeit name of
human rights global guard. If you say so, why wouldn't you intervene
to end or at least eliminate the terrifically exasperating human
crisis in Syria? What for would you spend enormous welfare on the
Saudi disowned teen? you have no desired interest to gain unless you
seek to stir up broad compassion. As Canadian parliamentary election
is around the corner, mr Trudeau's government is attempting to win
the
majority of votes. Human rights shibboleths have been politicised by
the Canadian government. What would be the Saudi rebellious
adolescent
prospect in Canada? Due to the fact that she has no authentic
qualification, she'll barely sell Sheesha at Arabic cafes in Toronto
streets. Human rights is a bogus tactic. It is primarily exercised by
western secular regimes to directly intervene in our affairs. Each
and
every apostate somewhere in the Muslim world attempts to gain fame
and
spark attention through faking a story of alleged persecution.
Consequently, these stories must thoroughly be tackled. This is the
situation of failures and unknown members of the society. There is a
psychologically declined behaviour within these malcontented acts. I
won't deny that there is plain breach of human rights principles in
almost all Arab states. However, if someone seeks to gain appeal,
asylum or whatever, why would he need to publicise a dramatical
account? Why wouldn't he just go through ordinary procedures? Now,
mr
Trudeau, I urge you to fairly respond to the following question. If
you are truly the primary guardian of human rights worldwide as your
foreign minister claimed, why won't you demand the administration of
Israeli detention center to immediately release incarcerated women
and
children? Would you dare even to think of this? The deceit has now
been wholly exposed. No government anywhere in the world interferes
into other nation's affairs unless an interest is sought. As we say
here in Egypt, it's not done for the sake of God and Patriotism. The
situation of the teenaged girl has been fully taken advantage of. In
other words, it has been politicised. If respect is considered, she
should have been returned to her family. Would you allow your
daughter
to go abroad without your consent? If she had been abused as she said
and that's quite possible, she could have reported her case to the
police. But no, she wanted to cause emotional attention and she
somewhat succeeded. Canada, however, has taken advantage of the
situation for essentially political objectives. What about the status
of many homeless and domestically abused women in your country? What
have you done to them so far? Lastly, this is me, Mustafa from Cairo
Egypt. I'm just keeping you noticed, that despite the deliberate
fraudulence in mass western media, there are sane and edified people
who fathom the proper truth. The war waged on us now is of cultural
nature. It's certainly more dangerous than the one that involves
tanks
and bombs. Thank you for reading. If you like to comment, you could
respond to this post. Mustafa Almahdy
--
(Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
shoreless ocean.)