[blind-democracy] The issues posed by the worldwide March for Science

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:53:17 -0400

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/04/20/pers-a20.html


The issues posed by the worldwide March for Science

Science and Socialism

20 April 2017

Hundreds of thousands of scientists and other professionals, together with students and working people who support them, will take part this Saturday in the worldwide March for Science. The demonstration has evoked a significant response, in large measure because it is seen as a way to protest the Trump administration’s attacks on scientific knowledge and investigation.

The Socialist Equality Party welcomes this demonstration. We call for the mobilization of working people throughout the world against the destruction of the environment by giant chemical and energy corporations; attacks on public education that threaten access to all aspects of human culture for an entire generation of young people; the subordination of science to the profit requirements of the ruling class and the military; and all censorship and restrictions on research and teaching.

The call for the March for Science refers to these issues, but it has definite limitations, summed up in its declaration that the attacks on science “are not a partisan issue.” This question must be understood correctly. The defense of science is only “nonpartisan” in the sense that both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for the attack on public education, the deteriorating environment, the growth of militarism and the effort to censor and suppress scientific research.

The defense of science is, however, profoundly political, as it has been throughout history, as far back as Galileo Galilei’s trial by the Roman Catholic Inquisition. Every reactionary government and class persecutes scientists and seeks to suppress and subordinate science to its own ends. The progress of science and reason has always depended upon the progress of society and social relations—and this is a political question.

The challenge today is to recognize the source of the attack on science, which did not suddenly arise from the limited brain of Donald Trump. He is only the crudest and most backward representative of a social system in which all human activity, including science, is subordinated to private profit. While science and technology have immensely developed the power of social production, this production remains trapped within the increasingly irrational forms of private capitalist ownership.

The defense of science is therefore inseparable from the revolutionary struggle of the main progressive force in modern society, the working class, against the corporate ruling elite.

Science and technology have made it possible to abolish hunger, cure disease, banish ignorance and secure a decent standard of living for every person on this planet. But under the profit system, vast wealth is monopolized by a tiny handful of the super-rich. Just eight mega-billionaires possess greater wealth than the poorest half of humanity, while hundreds of millions go hungry; millions die of preventable diseases; and schools, roads, water systems and other public infrastructure are crumbling.

Modern technology, from revolutionary developments in transportation to the creation of the Internet, has shattered the barriers to human interaction and made possible the integration of all humanity. Science itself is the most international of human enterprises, developing through global collaboration.

However, because of the division of the world into rival nation-states, technology is made the instrument of repression and persecution: the hounding of refugees and immigrants throughout the world; the building of walls against immigrants on the US-Mexico border; China’s “great firewall,” separating one billion people from the rest of the world; and the development of the NSA’s vast apparatus of global spying directed against the population of the entire world.

Most ominously, in the hands of the rival nation-states, with US imperialism taking the lead, science and technology have been perverted into means of mass destruction. The April 22 demonstration takes place under conditions of a growing threat of world war, with the Trump administration, backed by the US media and Democratic Party, firing missiles at Syria, dropping the largest bomb since Hiroshima and Nagasaki on Afghanistan, and threatening a preemptive military strike against North Korea.

The danger of a direct military conflict involving nuclear-armed powers is very real. More than anyone else, scientists know that this would mean the extinction of civilization, if not life on planet Earth.

What is the way forward? Those who wish to defend and advance the work of science must confront a contradiction in their own ways of thinking. They are accustomed to applying scientific methods to the processes of nature, but not to the workings of society, still less to politics.

In part, this derives from the greater complexity of social life, where the number of variables—including human beings—makes scientific analysis more complicated. More importantly, it reflects the ideological domination of the corporate ruling elite, which opposes efforts to apply rational standards to the operations of a social system that affords them unparalleled wealth and privilege. Within academia, the attack on objective truth and reason spearheaded by postmodernism and other forms of irrationalism is directed at all forms of scientific knowledge, above all at the science of society and history.

Scientists must find their way back to insights of their greatest predecessors like Albert Einstein, who were drawn to socialism as the application of reason to the development of modern society—and as the only means of ending war and dictatorship. This means taking up a study of Marxism, which bases its revolutionary politics on an analysis of objective reality and class interests.

The working class is the revolutionary force that has the capability to put an end to capitalism and establish a socialist society based on equality, democracy and social ownership of the wealth created by collective labor. In the Russian Revolution, whose centenary we mark this year, this scientific understanding was vindicated in practice, with the working class coming to power under the leadership of a Marxist party.

The working class cannot advance without the aid of science. But science itself requires the advance of the working class, which will provide science with the necessary mass base in society. In the final analysis, the progress of science—and the progress of humanity as a whole—depends on the resurgence of a new revolutionary movement of the working class. The socialist movement unites under its banner both the pursuit of scientific truth in all its forms and the struggle for human equality.

Statement of the Socialist Equality Party





Share this article:

Facebook


Twitter


Digg


Reddit


Delicious


StumbleUpon


Blogger


E-Mail





Commenting Discussion Rules »






New Today

Online lecture Saturday: The February Revolution


France announces major military deployment on presidential election day


UK parliament votes for snap June 8 general election


US vice president warns North Korea “the sword is ready”


US secretary of state issues war threat against Iran


more articles »


Perspectives

Science and Socialism


Snap UK general election called amid continuing Brexit crisis


Washington pushes world to brink of nuclear war


Trump administration recklessly escalating the conflict with Korea


Media, political establishment treat dropping of biggest bomb since Hiroshima as nonevent


more articles »


Science

Science and Socialism


Spectrum of anti-hydrogen observed


New discovery sheds light on the deep roots of the Agricultural Revolution


The discovery of a system with seven “Earth-like” exoplanets


Federal employees resist administration attempts to impose media gags


more articles »


Polemics

Science and Socialism


The silence of the pseudo-left on the danger of war


Australian pseudo-left promotes fraudulent posturing of new union head


Pseudo-left endorses imperialist onslaught against Syria


French NPA candidate Philippe Poutou defends Trump’s bombing of Syria


more articles »


Mehring Books

A Quarter Century of War: The US Drive for Global Hegemony 1990 - 2016

undefined

By David North



Get Involved!

Donate to the WSWS


About the ICFI


Join the IYSSE


Join the SEP



Socialist Equality Parties United States Germany Australia United Kingdom Sri Lanka Canada


Follow the WSWS

Facebook


Twitter


Youtube


RSS Feed


Daily Podcast


WSWS Newsletter



Recent Perspectives

Science and Socialism (20/04/2017)


Snap UK general election called amid continuing Brexit crisis (19/04/2017)


Washington pushes world to brink of nuclear war (18/04/2017)


Trump administration recklessly escalating the conflict with Korea (17/04/2017)


Media, political establishment treat dropping of biggest bomb since Hiroshima as nonevent (15/04/2017)



Most Read Over the Past 7 Days

1.Whistleblower uncovers London police hacking of journalists and protestors (15/04/2017)


2.Fallout continues from beating of United Airlines passenger David Dao (14/04/2017)


3.Nuclear experts speak on the dangers of war between the US and Russia (15/04/2017)


4.Obama lives it up in the lap of luxury (18/04/2017)


5.What would a US-European-Russian war look like? (13/04/2017)



The Editor recommends

Sri Lankan government sponsors sham celebration of the Russian Revolution (15/04/2017)


CIA Director calls WikiLeaks an “enemy,” says Assange has “no First Amendment freedoms” (15/04/2017)


Britain’s Guardian cynically poses as opponent of war in Syria (14/04/2017)


Right-wing media mobilizes in support of Humboldt University Professor Jörg Baberowski (14/04/2017)


White House Press Secretary: Hitler didn’t “sink to using chemical weapons” (12/04/2017)


Trump threatens North Korea, issues ultimatum to China (12/04/2017)







Socialism and the centenary of the Russian Revolution: 1917-2017
Lecture 1: Why Study the Russian Revolution
 (Text | Video)
Lecture 2: The Legacy of 1905 and the Strategy of the Russian Revolution
 (Text | Video)
Lecture 3: World War and Revolution: 1914-1917
 (Text | Video)


Fourth lecture:

Spontaneity and Consciousness in the February Revolution

April 22, 2017
Sign up now



Lectures and Essays by David North

Socialism and the centenary of the Russian Revolution: 1917-2017 (01/03/2017)


Georgi Valentinovich Plekhanov (1856–1918): His Place in the History of Marxism (12/05/2016)


Philosophy and Politics in an Age of War and Revolution (10/25/2017)


A Quarter Century of War: The US Drive for Global Hegemony 1990–2016 (07/11/2016)



Socialism and the Struggle Against War

ICFI Resolution: Socialism and the fight against war (02/18/2016)


SEP (US) Resolution: The fight against war and the political tasks of the SEP (08/25/2014)


SEP (Australia) Resolution: The Socialist Equality Party and the fight to build an international anti-war movement (07/27/2016)


SEP (Sri Lanka) Resolution: The political struggle against war and the tasks of the Socialist Equality Party (04/30/2016)


PSG(Germany) Resolution: The struggle against war and the tasks of the PSG (11/14/2014)

  .

About the WSWS | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Top of page

Copyright © 1998-2017 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserve


Other related posts:

  • » [blind-democracy] The issues posed by the worldwide March for Science - Roger Loran Bailey