https://socialistaction.org/2017/07/03/trumps-no-fly-zone-escalates-u-s-war-against-syria/
Trump’s ‘no fly zone’ escalates U.S. war against Syria
/ 1 day ago
July 2017 Raqqa bombingBy JEFF MACKLER
The lie that the U.S. is fighting Islamic State (ISIS) terrorism in
Syria was publicly exploded on June 18 when a U.S. F/A-18 “Super Hornet”
fighter jet launched from the George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier shot
down a Syrian government aircraft. Syria said its plane had carried out
a mission against ISIS in the countryside near Raqqa—the capital of
ISIS’s proclaimed caliphate.
State Department officials asserted that the downing of the Syrian jet
was in accord with U.S. policy to operate under its unilaterally
established “rules of engagement” that include the “collective
self-defense” of its “Syrian partners.” Translated, the quoted phrases
amount to a declaration that the U.S. and its imperial allies in Syria
will attack any and all forces that seek to interfere with U.S.
imperialist objectives.
In addition to its virtual “no fly zone” over the Raqqa region, U.S.
generals have set up a similarly “protected” garrison at al-Tanf in
southern Syria, on the key highway between Damascus and Baghdad, and
where its “Syrian partners” and U.S., British, and Norwegian advisers
are based. Here too, U.S. military tops have warned pro-Assad forces to
stay out, having tagged this region with the newly coined euphemism,
“zone of deconfliction.”
After the June 18 downing of the Syrian jet fighter, U.S. officials
cynically asserted that “the coalition does not seek to fight the Syrian
regime, Russian, or pro-regime forces partnered with them … [but] will
take appropriate measures to protect our forces.” Then, just two days
after they shot down the Syrian aircraft, U.S. warplanes shot down an
Iranian drone near the al-Tanf military base.
Establishing U.S. “No Fly Zones”
On several occasions, U.S. warplanes obliterated pro-Assad forces,
including Iranian-backed militia, that had ventured inside its
“protected zone” near al-Tanf.
After a May 18 U.S. attack, Defense Secretary James “Mad Dog” Mattis
declared: “We should not take this U.S. strike as a sign that the U.S.
is getting more involved in Syria,” an example of Orwellian doublespeak
if ever there was one.
CBS News reported that on June 6 and again on June 8, when “27
[pro-Assad] regime vehicles drove within 18 miles of al-Tanf, which
breached the [U.S.-declared] 34-mile radius of the army convoy’s
operations, U.S. aircraft first attempted to buzz the regime, but when
the convoy didn’t turn around, they [the U.S. forces] conducted a strike
against some of the vehicles.”
“The rebels being trained at al-Tanf are from a number of Arab rebel
groups, referred to by the U.S. as Vetted Syrian Opposition, or VSO, who
oppose both the Assad regime and ISIS,” according to an article by
Joshua Keating on the Slate website. Keating noted that “U.S. Special
Forces have been increasingly fighting alongside these rebel groups in
Southern Syria.”
The Wall Street Journal’s Yaroslav Trofimov reported: “The U.S. attack
at al-Tanf is significant not because the U.S. has once again struck
Assad’s forces, but because it did so in defense of Syrian rebels.” The
same report observed, “Once skeptical about U.S.-backed anti-Assad
‘rebels,’ Trump stated in a 2015 election debate that ‘we have no idea
who they are.’” Trump had suggested that they might be ISIS and added
that “We can’t be fighting ISIS and fighting Assad.” Today, the U.S. is
indeed fighting Assad, directly and indirectly, but its focus on ISIS is
more complicated.
A June 10 New York Times article, for example, noted that U.S. forces in
Raqqa were attacking ISIS from the North, East and West, but not the
South. ISIS forces were allowed to evacuate Raqqa, weapons and military
gear in tow, heading south along the Euphrates Valley toward Deir Al
Zour, where obviously they might be useful in assisting the ISIS attempt
to blockade Syrian forces in the city.
U.S. contemplates “stabilization light”
The public policy of the U.S. was presented in bold outline by several
U.S. officials and top imperialist planners and reported in the June 23
New York Times under the headline, “U.S. Sends Civilians to Stabilize
Recaptured Syrian Areas.” The referenced “civilians” include
representatives from the CIA-directed Agency for International
Development and representatives from the array of countries that are
supporting the U.S. war in Syria. Billions of dollars are to be expended
in this effort, not to rebuild Syria, but to insure the stability of the
occupying force in the regions the U.S. seeks to establish under its
control.
A minimum of 1000 U.S. troops would remain in these “recaptured”
regions, according to The Times report, and undoubtedly qualitatively
more if the U.S. warmakers believe they can further leverage their
intervention.
In the same article, Linda Robinson, a senior international policy
analyst at the RAND Corporation, expressed a note of caution: “Syria is
not a country that we control. This is stabilization light. We do not
have, nor do we intend to get, control of the place, which would enable
us to move and do these state-building activities” (my emphasis).
She added, “What is also very important to understand is what is the
tolerance of the Syrian government for the U.S. to go in and do these
activities. There have been increasing tensions with the regime, with
the Iranians and with the Russians and the possibility that we are
backing into a war with the Assad government and its backers.” Needless
to say, such a war has been underway for years despite the U.S lie that
its illegal, uninvited presence in Syria is to fight ISIS.
The June 18 attack on the Syrian aircraft was not the first such overt
assault since 2011, when the short-lived Syrian Arab Spring was quickly
hijacked by covert U.S.–backed terrorist forces aimed at the same
“regime change” operation in Syria that the U.S. had previously
orchestrated in Iraq, Libya, and Egypt. Since the April 7 U.S. Tomahawk
missile attack on the Syrian Shayrat air base—under the pretext of
retaliation for the unproven claim that the Assad government used sarin
gas—U.S. threats and overt attacks on Syrian government forces and its
supporters have become routine.
(A June 25 detailed article refuting President Trump’s accusation that
the Syrian government used sarin gas in the town of Khan Sheikhoun in
April 2017 has been published on the German on-line website Welt N24
Politik. Its author, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh,
cites several top U.S. military advisers to President Trump as insisting
that “this was not a chemical weapons strike.” But even after receiving
reports that sarin gas was not used by the Assad government, or anyone
else, the advisers note that Trump proceeded to bomb Syria anyway.)
The longstanding covert U.S./NATO/Gulf State monarchy regime-change war
against Syria, wherein billions of dollars have been secretly extended
to train and arm virtually all forces that aim to remove the Syrian
government, has now become open. The notion that a civil war between
competing Syrian factions prevails in Syria is a terrible fraud—one that
is employed by both the U.S. government and its bipartisan
propagandists, but also, tragically, by sections of the U.S. left.
Syria, as with all poor and oppressed nations, is the undeniable victim
of a U.S.-orchestrated imperialist attack, little different from the
imperialist conflagrations that plague oppressed people and nations
around the world—from the Middle East to Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
Hillary Clinton’s election-time advocacy of a “no fly zone” in
Syria—aimed at preventing Syrian and allied forces, including Russia,
Iran and the Lebanese-based Hezbollah, from ridding Syria of U.S.-backed
forces—has now become President Donald Trump’s official policy.
“Deconfliction” is the new U.S.-invented term to designate the
ever-expanding and always changing U.S. “no-fly zones,” that is,
portions of Syria that the U.S. hopes to occupy now to maximize its
leverage in a contemplated postwar Syrian negotiated settlement wherein
Syria’s future is to be determined not by the Syria people or government
but rather by the U.S.-established military relationship of forces on
the ground.
As U.S. air war Middle East chief Lt. General Jeffrey Harrington stated,
“Every war must come to an end, and when it does there will be a
negotiated settlement.” In this context, Harrington bragged to the New
York Times that his success in Syria resided in his efforts to increase
the “space” controlled by U.S.-backed forces.
Syria’s Right to Self-Determination
With the Syrian government’s September 2015 request to the Russian and
Iranian governments and Hezbollah forces in Lebanon to intervene on its
behalf, Syria has retaken large parts of the country that were
previously occupied by ISIS and other U.S.-backed forces. Some estimates
put that previously occupied figure at two-thirds of the country. Syria,
a sovereign nation, has every right to self-determination, that is, to
defend itself from imperial attack and to seek the support of allies to
challenge U.S.-led war and regime change efforts.
Al Udeid is the U.S. Central Command headquarters in the Middle East—the
nerve center of its air campaigns in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. It is
from Al Udeid that the U.S. conducts its now 16-year war in Afghanistan
and its current wars in Iraq and Syria. Al Udeid supplied the air and
ground forces in the U.S./NATO “humanitarian war” that destroyed Libya’s
infrastructure. U.S.-backed mercenaries from Qatar then proceeded to
“liberate” Libya’s capital of Tripoli using the pretext that the Gadhafi
government was about to exterminate 50,000 unarmed civilians in
Benghazi. British authorities now admit that there was no such threat.
Neither did the Saddam Hussein government have the “weapons of mass
destruction” that the U.S. warmakers insisted were about to be unleashed
on the world.
U.S. general espouses policy objectives
“If the Syrians were going to make a run at our guys, we were going to
be in a position to defend them ourselves,” said Lt. General Harrington
in a May 23 New York Times interview. “Our intent was to be in position
to support our guys and get back into fighting ISIS.” The reference to
“our guys,” of course, includes NATO and U.S.-financed and abetted
terrorist forces aimed at Assad’s removal. There are no other forces in
Syria today that operate independently of U.S. imperialism and its
coalition partners.
This May 23 article entitled, “Inside the Air War Over Syria: A High
Altitude ‘Poker Game,’” offers what The New York Times calls “a rare
glimpse into how the [U.S.] military plans and orchestrates the complex
ballet of strike, surveillance and refueling aircraft that keeps the war
going around the clock.”
This seemingly endless war has taken a terrible toll on the Syrian
people. A respected polling organization—ORB International, which does
polling for Western nations, including the U.S. government—nevertheless
demonstrated that support for the Bashar Assad government and its
Iranian allies far exceeds support for the U.S. and its “coalition
partners,” including the Free Syrian Army, al-Qaeda and similar groups.
Support for ISIS was miniscule.
Regardless, recognition and defense of Syria’s right to
self-determination—an inalienable right of all poor and oppressed
nations under imperialist attack or threatened by colonial occupation—is
the critical dividing line in the U.S. antiwar movement today. While not
taking any position on the Assad government itself, U.S. antiwar
organizations like the United National Antiwar Coalition (UNAC) are
staunch defenders of Syria’s right to self-determination. UNAC
unanimously re-affirmed this stance at its recent June 16-18 national
conference in Richmond, Va., where over 300 activists from 31 states
drew up plans for future coordinated, independent, mass mobilizations
against U.S. imperialist wars. (See UNAC’s adopted Action Plan at
unacpeace.org.)
The principle of the right of self-determination of oppressed nations
has its origins in the worldwide struggles of oppressed people to win
their freedom from the world’s chief colonizing and imperialist great
powers that had previously divided and re-divided the world and
subjected poor and conquered peoples to their rule. The history of the
Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and Asia is in great part a history
of the just struggles of the conquered and occupied nations for freedom
and self-determination.
Socialists and other democratically minded organizations have
traditionally supported all such struggles against imperialist
intervention, whether their leadership was socialist, bourgeois
nationalist or even downright reactionary. This was the case, for
example, when fascist Italy invaded feudal Ethiopia at the beginning of
WWII, or more recently when the U.S. invaded Iraq and deposed the Saddam
Hussein government. (Hussein had previously been a U.S. ally and
surrogate when he invaded Iran in 1980 in a six-year war that took the
lives of one million Iranians and 800,000 Iraqis.)
In all cases, the key criteria for opposition to imperialist war has
been the understanding that, freed from direct colonial control, the
working masses of these oppressed nations have the best opportunity to
deal with their own indigenous oppressors. The resultant weakening and
defeat of the imperialist occupier upon its forced withdrawal is an
added bonus that factors into any world balance sheet measuring the
relationship between imperialist subjugators and their victims.
The right of self-determination includes Syria’s right to call for help
from Russia, Iran, and others as they see fit. Such support—however
equivocal and for whatever opportunist reasons it may be given—can have
a significant impact on thwarting U.S. imperialist objectives. As
compared to late 2015, much of Syria today is free from the direct
control of the forces let loose by U.S. imperialism. It is these forces
that are overwhelmingly responsible for the estimated 500,000 Syrians
killed, including 100,000 Syrian Army soldiers as well as the 1.5
million Syrian refugees that are today scattered across the Middle East
and elsewhere.
This is not to say that the Russia’s or Iran’s primary objective is the
liberation of Syria from imperialist control, and certainly not the
establishment of a socialist or even democratic Syria. Vladimir Putin’s
objectives are simply to use Russian influence in Syria as a bargaining
chip to negotiate with the U.S./NATO cabal and win some concessions with
regard to NATO’s threatening encirclement of Russia and its imposition
of stinging sanctions arising out of Russia’s opposition to the
neo-fascist, US/EU-backed coup in Ukraine.
The recent widely televised two-part “Putin Interviews” with filmmaker
Oliver Stone revealed Russian perspectives and politics in bold relief
when Stone felt compelled to correct Putin’s repeated assertions of
friendship with his “U.S. partners.” Stone asked, “How can you
repeatedly call the U.S. your partner when it is ever surrounding you
with NATO troops and imposing hurtful sanctions?” Putin could only smile
and repeat his solidarity and claimed “partnership” with the U.S. while
holding out his hopes that peaceful negotiated solutions of their
differences would be forthcoming.
Putin, a spokesperson par excellence for a weak and isolated Russian
capitalism, basked with Stone in the splendor of his ornate state-owned
Russian dacha home, while praising the Russian Orthodox Church,
expressing his solidarity with U.S. imperialism’s “fight against
terrorism,” and ridiculing the great 1917 Russian Revolution. Putin, who
supported the U.S./NATO war that reduced Libya to rubble, lacked the
good sense to hide his reactionary social views as he disparaged women
and LGBTQI people. No liberating friend of the Syrian masses, Putin
seeks a negotiated accommodation with U.S. imperialism. This is similar
to other lesser capitalist nations that are increasingly compelled to
bend to the dictates of the world’s sole superpower.
Yet Russia’s role in forcing the U.S.-backed armed forces in Syria to
retreat cannot be dismissed, if for the sole reason that, absent an
overt imperialist conquest, opportunities for future struggle of Syria’s
working masses to advance their own interests will be that much greater.
Tragically, history does not always offer a clear and straight path to
liberation. Absent Russian and Iranian intervention in the Syrian
conflict, the likelihood of US/NATO imperial victory would be virtually
assured. The alternative to Russian and Iranian support for Syria can
only be Syria’s return to imperialist-imposed great power domination or
perhaps formal division or incorporation into neighboring states.
Today, Syria’s future rests less on the intentions of Russian or Iranian
capitalists than it does on the future emergence of an independent
anti-imperialist and socialist force inside Syria that champions the
interests of the Syrian working masses and on capacity of antiwar forces
in the U.S. and around the world to mobilize millions in the streets
demanding “U.S. Out Now!” “Self-determination for Syria!” and “Money for
Jobs, Not War!” These are the starting points for the mass antiwar
movement that can best serve the interests of the Syrian people.
In addition to marches, rallies, and teach-ins, the economic might of
the U.S. working class must be brought to bear. Indeed, the struggles
against all U.S. wars abroad and the fight against the ever-intensifying
wars against working people at home cannot be separated; in many ways it
is the same fight. We must say no to the wars of the one percent both at
home and abroad. Not one more dollar, not one more bullet for
Washington’s wars!
Photo: Damage in Raqqa after May 22 bombing by U.S.-led coalition.
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
49Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)49
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
July 3, 2017 in Anti-War, Middle East, Trump / U.S. Government.
Related posts
U.S. Threatens Syria War Escalation
U.S. imperialism’s Syria strategy
U.S. imperialist war in Syria: Acid test for antiwar movement
Post navigation
← Ambivalent Pride
GOP health-care revamp threatens Medicaid →
Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month July 2017 (3) June 2017 (16) May 2017
(17) April 2017 (14) March 2017 (13) February 2017 (19) January 2017
(13) December 2016 (12) November 2016 (19) October 2016 (12)
September 2016 (10) August 2016 (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14)
May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8)
January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015
(8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9)
May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11)
January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014
(9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10)
May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11)
January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013
(17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013
(15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013
(10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October
2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June
2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February
2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33)
October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24)
June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February
2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1)
October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7)
June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February
2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October
2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009
(2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9)
January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008
(16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008
(3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1)
June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3)
December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September
2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006
(14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006
(2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September
2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005
(16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005
(15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19)
September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21)
April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December 2001
(17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001
(18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000
(16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28)
February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20) November
1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July
1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999
(26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)
Search
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events
Category Cloud
Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada
Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools
Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International
Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History
Middle East Palestine Police & FBI Prisons South Asia Uncategorized Vote
Socialist Action Women's Liberation
View Calendar
Blog at WordPress.com.
Follow