Circular reasoning is basically to form a propositional argument out
of a predetermined conclusion. So for instance, someone might say, the
Bible is the inerrant word of God because it says so. An Atheist also
might say, God doesn't exist because there is no such thing. While it
is might be considered a logical fallacy by some, mainly Atheists.
Nonetheless, it is yet employed by them, even if it's not explicitly
implied. Roger calls me a liar because I said he would use the method
of Circular reasoning to justify his disposal. Well, yes he does. As
he assaults faith in general, he uses an orbitual argument. So for
instance, he says faith is evil because it is justified by religious
text. At its inception, he relies on his own assumption, discernment
or rather perception of the matter. He thence fortifies a conclusion
based on that. Of course, he has false assumption and consequently,
his conclusion is false too. Hey, I want to sing him a song. It's an
illusion, not a conclusion, his conclusion is false too. Roger is
immensely the God of delusion. He is the primal idol of aversion,
bigotry, irreligious sentiment and derision. His misrepresentation of
faith has been flawlessly falsified. He still continues to delude
himself of supposedly defeating me in the logical battlefield. He
remains fended for and adhered by some bunch of folks here in the
list. His position won't be longly bonded though. I will happilly
continue to relentlessly bombard him in the rational base until he
utterly fails. Although I don't have much time to do the job, I would
still free some of my time to do so. I am here to beat falsehood
holders down to the ground. Despite his denial, he and other Atheists
have used, still use and will use the method of circular reasoning to
propose and fend for their own notions. Calling it a fallacy is a
matter of perspective, it is commonly used in daily situations of our
own lives. So for instance, you would say to your friend, quit
smoking, because it is harmful to your health. Roger has been robustly
trounced in this round of the rational tournament. He still didn't
tell us, what is his cited reference of the claim that prophet
Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is the author of
the Koran? He must cite at least one reference or he shall justly be
labeled with throwing speculative based presumptions. So folks, are
you still going to defend Roger's shameful position? He is boldly
assaultive, hence, fearfully cringing. If he didn't come with
adequately attested commendations regarding his claim about the Koran,
this would add another instance, whereas he independently, again,
sought refuge with the usage of circular reasoning, despite his
unproved abnegation of doing so. So Carl, you may continue dismissing
my threads because they do not fit your own interest. I actually
destine to cut this Roger thing into tiny pieces as of argumentative
tactics. I knew he is endorsed because of faith and racial
considerations simultaneously. He is white, American, Atheist, and so
the rest of you. I base this assumption on mainly prepossessing
impression. Nonetheless, I would still like to recognise someone who
wouldn't find it problematic to stand by justice, even if it directly
collides with his own desirable surmisal. If I booked a flight with an
American airline company, I might be denied boarding because of faith
discrimination or racial disparity, particularly in Trump's
unfavourable era. This is also circular reasoning. This chapter is
expected to end with Roger miserably kicking the bucket, if he isn't
already.
On 4/8/19, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Found this on Facebook. Change the word Christian to Muslim and it could
be addressed to Mostafa:
Paula Wiercinski
>
found this about the christian persecution complex
As Christians, we have had our way for such a long time that we don’t
even recognise that being criticised isn’t really persecution… often, we
are simply
being disagreed with. But after many decades of having a monopoly on
influencing societal norms, we are finding ‘changing with the times’
tough. It is
not easy to wake up in 2019 and realise that your views are no longer
shared by the majority, and it’s even harder to accept that your system
of belief
no longer holds the same power over society as it once did.
I am truly sick of hearing Christians complain about being
‘persecuted’ for their beliefs. Historically, we have been the bullies.
How dare we claim to
now be the ‘bullied’ ones, simply because the majority of society has
decided that they don’t like the way we treat others.
19 mins Evolutionary Athe...
Save
//static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yU/r/J4IbRUPquuH.pngLike
Comment
Like
You and 4 others
Jordan Aniceto
As long as they dont try to kill or convert non-believers again to have
their way. 😂
1 reaction, including Like
Like
React
Reply
More
12 minutes ago
RJ Herrick replied · 1 reply
Jeff Scott
JoAnn Braithwaite
^^^
Like
React
Reply
More
9 minutes ago
Write a comment...
--
---
Christopher Hitchens
“ What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without
evidence. ”
― Christopher Hitchens,