I vote for the manual. It’s clear
On 3 Mar 2018, at 16:55, eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Its not a house rule really, to be honest in every group i played (except with
you) it was interpreted like that, and I simply picked it up. Off course if you
don't expect it you are always allowed to reply it, that bit at least we allow
it in this group.
If you don't like it feel free to vote against it, maybe others don't like it
too.
On 3 Mar 2018 3:56 pm, <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In general I have no problems with house rules or interpretations but for
someone who was not here at the begining it is impossible for me to know them
all.
I plan my turns based on rules and if a house rule is different from what I
am playing I am making a mistake in my turn, without knowing, putting my
navies and armies in danger.
I have no objections to the house rule.
On Mar 3, 2018 11:10 AM, "Makis Xiroyannis" <makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello all,
while we are waiting for Turkey/Prussia clean up files and Political phase,
I bring back this discussion raised by Tiron since the turn is starting
again now and we can decide on it if you wish.
Rules 7.5.1 and 7.5.1.1. are correct, as Tiron interprets them in the first
letter of this chain. We have been playing like this indeed.
Rules 7.3.2.1 and 7.3.6.2 are also correct as mentioned by Laertis, but we
are not only doing that while playing depot garrisons.
The missing piece of the rules that we need, is 7.3.7.1. To explain:
7.3.7.1 ENEMY CORPS OR CITY GARRISON IN AREA: If during movement a corps
moves into an area containing enemy corps not in a city, the corps must
cease movement and declare an attack. If enemy corps
and/or garrison factors are in a city the phasing corps may continue
movement or stop movement and besiege (see 7.5.4) or not, as the owning
player desires.
The trick here is when this decision - whether the corps is inside the city
or outside - is performed. In the explicit garrison rules we play with the
other group with Tiron, it is always clear what is in and what is outside.
But for our games, we decided that this decision will be taken by the
defending player the moment a hostile corps enters its area. We did this for
2 reasons:
1. Less bookkeeping (otherwise we should note for every corps on the map
whether it is inside, or outside of a city at every time)
2. More tactical flexibility (allowing the defending player to make a
decision during an opponents turn)
For me it is also slightly more realistic, given that corps always knew an
enemy was coming due to scouts, and when placed in an area they had the
privelege to chose a location close to fortified cities in case they needed
to fall back. In any case this is something the rules allow.
Personally I am in favour of continuing to play like this, ie the decision
of where the corps is (inside/outside) to be taken during hostile movement.
I am not strongly in favour, I simply think it gives a bit more flexibility.
You can all vote and decide on it.
M.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Tiron <strategija@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I fully agree that we should not alter rules mid turn, actuality I think we
should not change the rules of the game at all or as least as possible. We
play any game, from chess to EiA, because we start with the same set of
rules on both sides, we have the same understanding how the game can be
played.
Having said that I am also fine if the group has it's own set of house
rules or interpretations, but I also think as a "relatively" I can not be
expected to know them. I made game decisions based on the rules as I can
read them.
With Makis agreement I will change part of British naval turn to move the
fleet at Channel crossing to London and 2 British fleets blocking french
port into Channel Crossing.
On 2018-02-14 19:18, Makis Xiroyannis wrote:
Tiron feel free to change your naval where you think it is affected by
this rule
Just arrived home and can have 1 hour or so wife-free, could we play on a
bit the western battles so that we proceed with the turn? I am not
normally in a hurry, but given that I will be packing tommorow evening,
and traveling for 4 days, things will slow down
Turkish turn should not affect the west
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Makis Xiroyannis
<makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Like Yannis, I also remember many cases, and more importantly remember
cases were we LOST corps (instead of retreating into the city) so that
the opponent cannot move further. I have lost several corps this way, and
the centrals too.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Yannis Sykamias <ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I can certainly recall cases from our first war with France where we
applied this for corps thus allowing the attacker to continue its move.
I agree with Makis, it is not proper to apply any change in the middle
of a turn so we may proceed the turn while discussing on what is the
proper way to implement this action.
_____________________________
From: Laertes Papaspyrou <bitoulis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 19:52
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Something about rules
To: <eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Regarding the rule under discussion, we play it as such for depot
garrisons. Not sure about corps.
I found the below rules :
7.3.2.1: A corps must cease movement when it consumes its movement
allowance or when it enters an area containing an unbesieged enemy corps
(not if the area contains only cossacks, freikorps, guerrillas and/or
garrisons).
7.3.6.2 GARRISONED DEPOT AREA: If an enemy depot is garrisoned, the
player controlling the garrison factors has the option of immediately
destroying the depot before the moving force chooses whether to leave the
area (if permissible) or to stay and ght. If the garrison does not
elect to
destroy the depot and the phasing force chooses to stop its movement and
ght, the depot may be captured after land combat (see 7.3.6.1) and
destroyed or converted (but not used for supply this major power's
sequence-also see 7.5.2.14). If the garrison destroys the depot, the
garrison
surrenders or all or part (if city cannot hold all-the part not moved to
the
city will surrender) can be moved to an unbesieged friendly controlled or
vacant city in that same area, at the owning player's option.
So it seems you only get he option to continue moving when facing a
depot garrison. I think this how we have been playing by now.
From: Makis Xiroyannis <makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, 14 February 2018, 19:46
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Something about rules
I don't have the rules in front of me but this is how we have been
playing it yes. I suggest we do not change it mid move even if you are
correct. I would also suggest that you change the part of your naval
move that was jeopardised due to playing differently.
'Re Turkey, I had hoped he would have posted so that you have an overall
view of things, but something is probably holding him up, so I would
suggest we continue with the Western front were Turkish actions are not
very relevant.
On 14 Feb 2018 6:59 pm, "Tiron" <strategija@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
During discussions with my allies it turned out that the group has
played before in one why I find unusual and it certainly compromises
part of my naval move.
I am told the corps can continue movement after initial battle is
declared but defender retreats into city.
I would like to note the rules here:
7.5.1 GENERAL RULES OF LAND COMBAT: If at the end of all movement of
the phasing major
power, enemy forces (excluding guerillas-see 10.1.1.3) occupy the same
area as its corps, freikorps or cossacks, the phasing major power must
attack in those areas (also see 7.3.7 and 7.3.8).
7.5.1.1 DEFENDER RETIREMENT INTO CITY: Any forces or portion of forces
upon whom an attack is declared may immediately retire into any friendly
controlled or vacant, and unbesieged city in that area but not so as to
exceed that city's garrison capacity.
7.5.1 is clear, you complete your movement and anywhere you enter enemy
area and say Attack!
7.5.1.1. says after you said Attack! defender can retreat into city .
So the sequence should be like this
Movement -> Attack -> Retreat into city
I do not see where is says after retreating into city you go back to
step 1.
On a side note, are we waiting for Turkish turn or we proceed with
French battles?