we play long time together and to me countries look like expansion of players
characters.
even Tiron and Dimitris who joined later, their presence made us to forget the
previous players.
so as difficult is to imagine a France not played by Makis or a GB not from
Tiron, the same is to imagine a Spain without Laertis.
i was thinking option 3, when battles were to resolve, when i realized what
like most in the game. interacting with people i know and i can have fun with.
i know most of you and i still can have fun (even if it is reduced without
Laertis)
if had the otpion 4. Make (somehow) Laertis change his mind, i'd be happy to
chose it. of what i have, NOW i'll go for 1-3-2.
my suggestion is to avoid having Spain uncontrolled and if possible have a
player who would like to be focused on the game, who will interact with all
other players and who will show respect to the time and mood we have invested
so far. i'd be happy if i knew him and even more if he will be able to give
Spain a character. just like (hated Laertis did)
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Tiron <strategija@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 20:29
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: what next?
I support Nikolaoy proposal.
Run Spain as UMP to keep the game going and at the same time look for
replacement.
On 31.5.2019. 19:16, NIKOLAOY DHMHTRIOS wrote:
I asked a friend/co-player
to become Spain
he is interested in the period
but he didn't know the game
so I sent him the rules yesterday
I may have an answer (hopefully positive) during the weekend
meanwhile I 'm not against the Ottos acting as Spain
Στις 2019-05-31 18:18, Yannis Sykamias έγραψε:
I vote for 1-2-3 and I believe that either Makis or Teo may play Spain until
the end of current war.
Long term, although the game is designed for 7 active players, we may use the
UMP option since it is already in the rules in order to accommodate for cases
that 7 players are not available.
I would not like to go until the end with Spain in this status but I prefer it
than destroying the game.
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of T. B. <scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 5:39:46 PM
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: what next?
If I may, I would wish to express my opinion last.
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Makis Xiroyannis
<makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 31 May 2019 17:29
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: what next?
As for myself, I will go with any of the three options. But my personal
preference is 1-3-2, in that order.
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:28 PM Makis Xiroyannis
<makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Gentlemen,
with one of the starting players dropping out of the game, we are left with
some choices. For the time being, the Ottomans could play Spain as due to their
agreements they are their closest allies and this is not likely to change for
the current war. But in the long run, we need to...
1. find a replacement for Spain
2. treat Spain as an UMP
3. end this game
What is your opinion, what would you like most?
M.