----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon Tzur" <sharontzu5@xxxxxxx> Subject: empty vessels A brief response to something I read on the list a few days ago – I believe by Batya. She mentioned that the new program treats the students with respect and..." assumes that students are not 'empty vessels' being filled with facts like Mr .Gradgrind in Hard Times did to his unfortunate victims. HOTS insists that literature cannot be taught as a fully frontal assault or a display of the teachers understanding and magical ability to decode. The students in the examination or the log and in the classroom are being invited to join this thinking process." As others have written, making HOTs the central organizational concept is not the only way to ensure that students are respected, and not treated as empty vessels into which teachers pour their wisdom. I've always seen literature as a joint venture in which students work together with each other (sometimes individually, sometimes in groups, and sometimes as a class) and with myself to try to understand what the writer is trying to express. Literature is a subject where students can very much make a contribution based on their own understanding and their own life experience. I try to ask questions and provide tools which will enable and challenge students to think and come up with their own answer. Over the years, many of my best insights into the pieces of literature that I teach have come from my students' input. Students are most certainly part of the thinking process. Batya's wording however made me wonder. Are teachers not equally worthy of respect? Or are we the empty vessels into which a new theory of teaching literature through HOTs can be poured? ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------