----- Original Message ----- From: Ruthi - rsheffer@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Other opinions I thought so too till I read yesterday's article by Assa El. I don't want to say anything about him as a journalist precisely because I am afraid I might say something "rude and extremely discourteous" .So I will just say "he doesn't know what he is talking about." Can't be bothered to go over his arguments point by point., because frankly he is not interested in the truth but just in being provocative and bad-mouthing us and the Union. Ruthi Phil wrote: >I have been against the way this strike has been conducted and especially >by Ran Erez, who is an embarrassment. But lately I have been troubled by the intolerance of ETNI posters to opposing opinions, most clearly by the reaction to Amotz Assa-El's article. It seems that differing opinions are just not accepted. Instead of arguing against Mr. Assa-El's points, there have been personal attacks against him, the mildest of which has been that "he doesn't know what he is talking about." I don't remember all the terms hurled at him, but they were rude and extremely discourteous. I remember "Mr. As El" and lately "idiot", "supposedly intellegent Mr. Asa-els", "twit", "stupid article". >I shudder if this is the way students are taught to write criticisms of points with which they do not agree. Is this the way students are guided in our classes? Are we supposed to attack personally the author rather than arguing against his points? Are they taught that all who write articles that reflect our ideas are brilliant and 100% right, while others are 100% wrong and also idiots? >The abuse piled upon Mr. Assa-El, a journalist who happens to not agree >with us, is embarrassing because it is directed by teachers. >I felt I had to let my views known. ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - www.etni.org ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------