---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: alternative assessment and HOTS Many years ago, my school participated in a project for alternative assessment. It was called project 22 because of the number of schools that participated. We didn't do an English bagrut for 5 years (that's how long the project lasted.) Different schools chose different subjects. The point of the project was to see if alternative assessment can replace bagrut. During that time, we made our own program and were under careful scrutiny of the MOE. The bagrut marks were what the teacher gave, very much like the LOG today. We chose to join the project willingly and that is a vital factor in the success of any project. I'm not exactly sure why it didn't continue. One of the factors was a new minister, a new mancal, no money, etc. (I've heard from other teachers who participated in all kinds of new projects that ended up the same way as Project 22) I think that this is what should happen with the HOTS. Schools that are willing to participate in the project should work on it for a few years and then we can measure the results based on bagrut marks before and after and various other forms of feedback. It's not fair to try and coerce teachers to implement the program before it has been successfully tested. It's certainly not scientific enough for a few teachers to get up and say "we're doing the LOG and the kids love it." Incidentally, I have heard from others who have done the LOG and were miserable. (I'm curious if the kids like the LOG so much as we heard because they get higher marks.) I may be wrong, but as I said, the program must be tested and proven pedagogically sound in a more accurate manner. ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------