[etni] Fwd: re: log versus test
- From: ETNI list <etni.list@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Etni <etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 10:29:56 +0300
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adele Raemer <araemer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: log versus test
The old f (as well as all of the non literature modules) reflected
performance. Not achievement. The lit modules reflect both.
Adele
Sandra wrote:
> i suggest that the ministry decide: log for all or test for all. there
> is a difference in the results. there are problems with the test.
> is there a silent majority out there who found that the results of the
> test were way less than expected and significantly lower than the
> magen grades?
> and if F is supposed to be harder than e and easier than g, why the
> discrepancy? the grades of the old F were more reflective of the
> pupils' achievements.
> it seems unfair to penalize the kids so that we can feel that the kids
> are tested on material they were taught. weren't they always?
**************************************
** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org
** post to list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** help - ask@xxxxxxxx
** David Lloyd: ETNI founder & manager
http://david.greenlloyd.com
***************************************
Other related posts: