---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: sbshai <sbshai@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: the literature module F It's important to be aware, however, that universities and colleges don't view the logs (which are graded by the teacher who assigns them to her/his students) as a valid assessment tool of the students' knowledge of literature. The logs & exams each have their advantages and shortcomings, but it's difficult to counter the argument of the institutions of higher learning. Chag sameach, Batya Aliza wrote: > Here is some food for thought about the F literature module: How come > that poetry is banned from the literature module the second time in a > row? Does it indicate that we should not teach it? AND how come that > the only questions on the play and the novel are the bridging > assignments? Is that how the MOE tests the study of the most prominent > pieces? After having seen the literature module I wonder if I do not > actually wrong my students by convincing them to do the LOG. Our LOG's > summative assessments were definitely far more valid and reliable as > tools of assessment than this summer's literature bagrut. ************************************** ** Join ETNI on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/31737970668/ ** ETNI Blog and Poll http://ask-etni.blogspot.co.il/ ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org ** post to ETNI List - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** help - ask@xxxxxxxx ***************************************