I refuse to get bogged down in another discussion of the new literature bagrut, but what I WILL say is that from what I can see an awful lot of people are kicking up a terrible storm around something that they either know nothing about OR have heard only second hand, half-baked ("half-baked" because anyone who is taking the course THIS year is still ONLY in the middle of it) reports. Those who REALLY want to know, have signed up for a course and will learn everything they need to. Is the program perfect? Of course not! It is only the beginning, following a pilot that was done under difficult conditions (started late because of teachers' strike, therefore forced to be split over two years - with problems of teachers changing, loosing momentum over the summer, then truncated in the south, anyway, by the war) yet has come out with some interesting and encouraging results. Bottom line: 1. it will put literature back on the map 2. it is more interesting and motivating than "another unseen" 3. we CAN all benefit from it.. If we open our minds long enough to learn about it, and help improve and perfect it rather than going in kicking and screaming. Again now, as with the last spate of emails flying around out there - a LOT is based on dis/mis/lack of information. It just seems a shame to me that rather than put our energies into bettering our teaching programs, people are putting their energy into opposing that which they do not understand. Adele "We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children." Native American Proverb ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------