[gps-talkusers] Re: FW: [Nfbnet-master-list] Legislative Alert Subminimum wage

  • From: Linnette Whalen <linnettew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, George B <gbmagoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:06:48 -0400

This is truly a stretch.
On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:00 PM, George B wrote:

> yes it does because the developers of the products can higher disabled 
> persons, (blind) and pay them crap by law if this passes and the price of the 
> products would not come down to reflect the crap wadges if this bill passed
>  
> From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Linnette Whalen
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 11:56
> To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jacob Struiksma
> Cc: Mobile Speak/Magnifier Smartphone Users List
> Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: FW: [Nfbnet-master-list] Legislative Alert 
> Subminimum wage
>  
> What you are sharing may be of interest to many. However, it has nothing to 
> do with the topic of GPS. 
> On Jun 24, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Jacob Struiksma wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Dear Fellow Federationists:
>  
> I am writing to inform you that a principle tenet of our organization is 
> being threatened.  We are actively developing legislation that will work 
> toward the repeal of Regulation 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 
>  Meanwhile, the proposed language in Title V of the Workforce Investment Act 
> (WIA) reauthorization, specifically Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act, 
> threatens to send us backward in our struggle for full participation and 
> competitive employment at competitive wages.  
>  
> Most of us are aware that in 1938, when every other employee in America was 
> being guaranteed the workforce protection of a federal minimum wage through 
> the passage of the FLSA, Section 14(c) of this act denied the blind and other 
> workers with disabilities this same protection by allowing for the payment of 
> subminimum wages.  Since our founding in 1940, the National Federation of the 
> Blind has fought against the erroneous misconception that blind people cannot 
> be productive employees, and we have made significant strides toward a 
> correct understanding of the true capacity of the blind.  Contrarily, the 
> proposed language found in Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act is a tacit 
> endorsement of Section 14(c) of the FLSA and its antiquated contention that 
> people with disabilities cannot be competitively employed.  
>  
> If passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, language in 
> Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act will create a link between the 
> Rehabilitation Act and Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act that has 
> never before existed.  This will create legislation with a conflict between 
> the philosophy of capacity for competitive employment set by the 
> Rehabilitation Act, and the philosophy of incapacity toward subminimum wages 
> set by Section 14(c) of the FLSA, setting the stage for more workers with 
> disabilities to be inappropriately steered toward sheltered employment and a 
> life of low expectations rewarded with subminimum wages.  
>  
> The following list contains the names of members of the Senate HELP 
> committee.  If your Senator is a member of the committee, please call his/her 
> office to respectfully express your adamant objection to linking subminimum 
> wage to the Rehabilitation Act, and to insist that Section 511 of the 
> Rehabilitation Act be removed from the bill.  If your Senator is not a member 
> of the HELP committee, call the committee chair (Senator Tom Harkin) and the 
> ranking member (Senator Michael Enzi) to register your objection.  
>  
> Please share this information with friends and family and encourage them to 
> assist us with this effort.  Please call or e-mail me with any questions, and 
> to keep me posted on your progress.  
>  
> Sincerely, 
>  
> Anil Lewis
> Director of Strategic Communications
> NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
> Telephone:  (410) 659-9314, extension 2374
> E-mail: alewis@xxxxxxx
>  
> Senator
> State
> Telephone
> Senator Lamar Alexander 
> Tennessee 
> (202) 224-4944
> Senator Michael F. Bennet 
> Colorado
> (202) 224-5852
> Senator Jeff Bingaman 
> New Mexico
> (202) 224-5521
> Senator Richard Blumenthal 
> Connecticut 
> (202) 224-2823
> Senator Richard Burr 
> North Carolina
> (202) 224-3154
> Senator Robert Casey, Jr. 
> Pennsylvania
> (202) 224-6324
> Senator Mike Enzi 
> Wyoming
> (202) 224-3424
> Senator Al Franken 
> Minnesota
> (202) 224-5641
> Senator Kay R. Hagan 
> North Carolina
> (202) 224-6342
> Senator Tom Harkin 
> Iowa
> (202) 224-3254
> Senator Orrin G. Hatch 
> Utah 
> (202) 224-5251
> Senator Johnny Isakson 
> Georgia
> (202) 224-3643
> Senator Mark Steven Kirk 
> Illinois 
> (202) 224-2854
> Senator John McCain 
> Arizona
> (202) 224-2235
> Senator Jeff Merkley 
> Oregon
> (202) 224-3753
> Senator Barbara A. Mikulski 
> Maryland
> (202) 224-4654
> Senator Lisa Murkowski 
> Alaska
> (202) 224-6665
> Senator Patty Murray 
> Washington
> (202) 224-2621
> Senator Rand Paul 
> Kentucky
> (202) 224-4343
> Senator Pat Roberts 
> Kansas
> (202) 224-4774
> Senator Bernard Sanders 
> Vermont
> (202) 224-5141
> Senator Sheldon Whitehouse 
> Rhode Island
> (202) 224-2921
>  
>  
> 
> I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
> SPAMfighter has removed 1849 of my spam emails to date.
> 
> Do you have a slow PC? Try free scan!
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbnet-master-list mailing list
> Nfbnet-master-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>  

Other related posts: