[gps-talkusers] what do you think about this
- From: "Cheree Heppe" <cheree@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 00:00:37 -0800
(Begin forwarded message)
Subject: [leadership] Serotek declares war on the traditional
> adaptivetechnology industry and their blind ghetto products
>
>
> This is no warm fuzzy of a read, but something well worth the read and in my
> opinion long over due. Kudos to SeroTek.
>
> Richard
> ***
> Cited from http://blog.serotek.com/
> The Serotek Ultimatum
> Serotek declares war on the traditional adaptive technology industry and
> their blind ghetto products. With this announcement we are sending out a
> call to arms to every blind person and every advocate for the blind to rise
> up and throw off the tyranny that has shaped our lives for the past two
> decades. It is a tyranny of good intentions - or at least what began as good
> intentions. But as the proverb says, "the road to hell is paved with good
> intentions." And for the past two decades the technologies originally
> conceived to give us freedom have been our shackles. They have kept us tied
> down to underperforming, obscenely expensive approaches that only a small
> percentage of blind people can afford or master. They have shackled us to
> government largess and the charity of strangers to pay for what few among us
> could afford on our own. And we have been sheep, lead down the path,
> bleating from time to time, but without the vision or the resources to stand
> up and demand our due.
> That time is past.
> We stand today on the very edge of universal accessibility. Mainstream
> products like the iPod, iPhone, and newly announced iPad are fully
> accessible out of the box. And they bring with them a wealth of highly
> desirable accessibility applications. The cost to blind people is exactly
> the same as the cost to sighted people. It's the same equipment, the same
> software, the same functionality, and fully accessible.
> What Apple has done, others are doing as well. The adaptive technology
> vendor who creates hardware and software that is intended only for blind
> folks, and then only if they are subsidized by the government, is a
> dinosaur. The asteroid has hit the earth, the dust cloud is ubiquitous, the
> dinosaur's days are numbered.
> But dinosaurs are huge, and their extinction does not happen overnight..
> Even as they die, they spawn others like them (take the Intel Reader for
> example). Thank you, no. Any blind person can have full accessibility to any
> type of information without the high-cost, blind-ghetto gear. They can get
> it in the same products their sighted friends are buying. But let's face it;
> if we keep buying that crap and keep besieging our visual resource center to
> buy that crap for us, the dinosaurs of the industry are going to keep making
> it. Their profit margins are very good indeed. And many have invested
> exactly none of that profit in creating the next generation of access
> technology, choosing instead to perpetuate the status quo. For instance,
> refreshable braille technology, arguably the most expensive
> blindness-specific(and to many very necessary) product has not changed
> significantly in 30 years. Yet, the cost remains out of reach for most blind
> people. Where's the innovation there? Why have companies not invested in
> cheaper, faster, smaller, and more efficient ways to make refreshable
> braille? Surely the piezoelectric braille cell is not the only way? And what
> about PC-based OCR software? It's still around a thousand dollars per
> license, yet core functionality hasn't changed much; sure, we get all sorts
> of features not at all related to reading, along with incremental accuracy
> improvements, but why are these prices not dropping either, especially when
> you consider that comparable off-the-shelf solutions like Abby Finereader
> can be had for as low as $79? ? And let's not forget the screen reader
> itself, the core technology that all of us need to access our computers in
> the first place. Do we see improvements, or just an attempt to mimic
> innovation with the addition of features which have nothing to do with the
> actual reading of the screen, while maintaining the same ridiculous price
> point.
>
> This maintaining of the status quo will, inevitably, face an enormous crash,
> worse than the transition from DOS to Windows based accessibility. You can
> expect a technology crash that will put users of the most expensive
> accessibility gear out of business.
> Why? I won't bore you with all the technical details, but the basic story is
> that some of these products have been kept current with patches and fixes
> and partial rewrites and other tricks we IT types use when we haven't got
> the budget to do it right, but we need to make the product work with the
> latest operating system. That process of patching and fixing creates an
> enormous legacy barrier that makes it impossible to rewrite without
> abandoning all who came before. But you can only keep a kluge working for so
> long before it will crumble under its own weight. That, my friends, is
> exactly where some of the leading adaptive technology vendors find
> themselves today.
> There are exceptions. Serotek is an exception because we have completely
> recreated our product base every three years. GW Micro is an exception
> because they built their product in a highly modular fashion and can update
> modules without destroying the whole. KNFB is an exception because they take
> advantage of off-the-shelf technologies, which translate ultimately into
> price drops and increased functionality.
>
> But even we who have done it right are on a path to obsolescence. The
> fundamental need for accessibility software is rapidly beginning to vanish.
> The universal accessibility principles we see Apple, Microsoft, Olympus, and
> others putting in place are going to eliminate the need for these specialty
> products in a matter of just a very few years.
> Stop and think. Why do you need accessibility tools? To read text? E-book
> devices are eliminating that need. None of them are perfect yet, but we are
> really only in the first generation. By Gen2 they will all be fully
> accessible. To find your way? GPS on your iPhone or your Android based phone
> will do that for you. To take notes? Easy on any laptop, netbook, or iPad.
> Heck, you can record it live and play it back at your convenience. Just what
> isn't accessible? You can play your music, catch a described video, scan a
> spreadsheet, take in a PowerPoint presentation - all using conventional,
> off-the-shelf systems and/or software that is free of charge.
> There are still some legacy situations where you need to create an
> accessibility path. Some corporations still have internal applications that
> do not lend themselves to modern devices. There will certainly be situations
> where a specialized product will better solve an accessibility problem than
> a mainstream one, especially in the short term. We don't advocate throwing
> the baby out with the bathwater, but we do advocate that we begin to hasten
> the inevitable change by using accessible mainstream solutions wherever
> possible. Even now, the leading edge companies are reinventing their
> internal systems with accessibility as a design criteria, so the situations
> that require specialized products will certainly become fewer as time goes
> on.
> If our current Assistive technology guard's reign is coming to an end, why
> the war? Why not just let it die its own, natural, inevitable death? Because
> nothing dies more slowly than an obsolete technology. Punch cards hung on
> for twenty or thirty years after they were completely obsolete. The same is
> true for magnetic tape. Old stuff represents a comparatively large
> investment, and people hate to throw away something they paid a lot of money
> for even if it's currently worthless. But that legacy stuff obscures the
> capabilities of the present. It gets used in situations where other
> solutions are cheaper and more practical. The legacy stuff clogs the
> vocational rehab channel, eating up the lion's share of the resources but
> serving a tiny portion of the need. It gets grandfathered into contracts. It
> gets specified when there is no earthly reason why the application requires
> it. The legacy stuff slows down the dawning of a fully accessible world.
> It hurts you and it hurts me.
> To be sure, I make my living creating and selling products that make our
> world accessible. But first and foremost, I am a blind person. I am one of
> you. And every day I face the same accessibility challenges you face. I have
> dedicated my life and my company to making the world more accessible for all
> of us, but I can't do it alone. This is a challenge that every blind person
> needs to take up. We need to shout from the rooftops: "Enough!"
> We need to commit ourselves in each and every situation to finding and using
> the most accessible off the shelf tool and/or the least-cost, highest
> function accessibility tool available. With our dollars and our commitment
> to making known that our needs and the needs of sighted people are 99% the
> same, we can reshape this marketplace. We can drive the dinosaurs into the
> tar pits and nurture those cute fuzzy little varmints that are ancestors to
> the next generation. We can be part of the solution rather than part of the
> problem.
> And all it takes is getting the best possible solution for your specific
> need. Once you have found the solution to fill that need, let the company
> know you appreciate their work towards better accessibility. Let your
> friends (sighted and blind) know about these accessibility features; they
> probably don't know that such features exist.
> Make your needs known to the vocational rehab people you are working with,
> and don't allow them to make recommendations for a specific technology for
> no other reason than that it's been in the contract for years. Make sure
> your schools and your workplace understand the need to push technology in to
> the accessible space. Show them the low-cost alternatives. In this economy
> some, the intelligent ones, will get it and the tide will begin to turn.
> And then in short order the tsunami of good sense will wash away the old,
> and give us the space to build a more accessible world for all of us. Let
> the demand ring out loud and clear and the market will follow.
> If this message rings true to you, don't just shake your fist in agreement
> and leave it at that. let your voice be heard! Arm yourself with the vision
> of a future where there are no social, conceptual, or economic barriers to
> accessibility, and let your words and your actions demonstrate that you will
> not rest until that vision is realized. Take out your wallet and let your
> consumer power shine! You do mater as a market people! You have kept this
> company alive with your money for 8 years this month! I believe that if we
> all get together and do our part, we will finally say "NO more!" same old
> same old! Join the revolution! Together we can change the world!
> Posted by Mike Calvo at 2:15 PM 3 comments facebook Add to del.icio.us
> Labels: Accessibility Is A Right, Apple, Blind Ghetto, community, disruptive
> technology, GW Micro, Intel, Mike Calvo, rant, Serotek, System Access, Unive
(End forwarded message)
To change your email settings (unsubscribe, digest only, or vacation mode):
http://senderogroup.com/social_media/email.htm
Additionally, to unsubscribe send an email to
gps-talkusers-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject.
Other related posts: