dinesh vishwanathan wrote:
,----
| If the argument is solely that private messages *may* get on the list,
| then I think that it's plain bs.. The current settings:
`----
[snip]
,----
| turned off by default. Moreover, a few members seem to be sending
| emails to both addresses of the list, which
`----
[snip]
,----
| c)The last couple of times I'd asked questions on this list, I was
| wondering why a coupla people were replying to me in private. Now I
| guess I know why :)
`----
whoa! [and snip more stuff]
,----
| d)Private messages are sent very rarely, and thus ease of use far
| outweighs the problem of hastily sent private emails. Imagine the case
| where members of this
`----
did you even read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html ;?
cheers,
-Suraj
--
,-----------------[http://www.symonds.net/~suraj/]---o
| Shyama Sastri has composed only on goddess Ambal.
`------------------------------[suraj@xxxxxxxxxxx]---o