Cache and push technology - Adobe Flash.  I evaluated a web application at an employer site.  Jaws viewed the web page as an image and just responded, No document.  The provider is jbcomm dot net and the product is a predictive dialer.  Neither the Jaws nor PC Cursor see the web page and skip over it as an image.  I originally suspected that this may be Citrix or RDP but it is not.  The provider refers to this as cache and push technology using Abobe Flash plugin.  I can only interact with the website using the mouse.  Is there any accessible solution for this technology?  Paul Bonarrigo On Saturday, March 7, 2015 11:09 PM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: jawsscripts Digest   Sat, 07 Mar 2015   Volume: 03 Issue: 051 In This Issue:       [jawsscripts] Re: Small script idea ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 23:15:54 +0530 Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Small script idea From: Sameer Khan <rmpsameerkhan@xxxxxxxxx> Hiccupscfghyhju Dyifschye On Feb 13, 2015 11:27 PM, "Don Mauck" <don.mauck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, this seems to work. I wonder if this is an improvement from earlier > versions of JAWS. I only have 16 on this machine. > -----Original Message----- > From: Soronel Haetir [mailto:soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06 AM > To: jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Small script idea > > An example page is: http://patterico.com/ > > If I am at the top of the page and hit 'i', I land on "Recent > Comments" at level 0, then if I hit 'i' again I land on the first > comment line, and if I arrow down to the bottom of the list of recent > comments I have: > list end nesting level 1 > list end > > which tells me that the comments list is indeed nested under the "recent > comments" item. > > Do you see different behavior if you try the above sequence? > > On 2/13/15, Don Mauck <don.mauck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Interesting, that's not my experience. I'll check some other lists to > > see if I'm missing something, anything's possible. So in reading what > > you want to do, I do see where that could be useful as well. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Soronel Haetir [mailto:soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:42 AM > > To: jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Small script idea > > > > That sure is not my experience. When I use 'i' (at least in Firefox) > > it hits every single list item, regardless of nesting level. > > > > On 2/13/15, Don Mauck <don.mauck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Right but the "I" won't get to the secondary lists that are a sub set > >> of the primary lists. That's what I was thinking. > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Soronel Haetir [mailto:soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:23 AM > >> To: jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Small script idea > >> > >> No, the entire point would be to skip the child lists. the 'i' > >> navigation key can already be used if you want to navigate to the > >> next list item regardless of what list it appears in. > >> > >> On 2/13/15, Don Mauck <don.mauck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Would this be able to read the sublists, like when using the letter > >>> "I" to read the lists in the bulleted lists. I've always wanted to > >>> be able to read the lists within the list if that makes sense. > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Soronel Haetir [mailto:soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx] > >>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:00 AM > >>> To: jawsscripts > >>> Subject: [jawsscripts] Small script idea > >>> > >>> Jaws scripters, > >>> > >>> Has anyone considered a pair of scripts that would always move to > >>> the next or prior item at the same list level? > >>> > >>> That is, given the following lists: > >>> > >>> L1 (a) > >>> l2 > >>> l2 > >>> l1 (b) > >>> l2 > >>> l2 > >>> > >>> with l1 being items at level 1 and l2 being child items of an L1 > >>> item, that if focus were on the item marked a moving forward would > >>> select the item marked b, and if b were focused moving to the prior > >>> item would select a? > >>> Does anyone else think this would be useful? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Soronel Haetir > >>> soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx > >>> __________ > >>> > >>> View the list's information and change your settings at > >>> http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > >>> > >>> __________ > >>> > >>> View the list's information and change your settings at > >>> http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Soronel Haetir > >> soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx > >> __________ > >> > >> View the list's information and change your settings at > >> http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > >> > >> __________ > >> > >> View the list's information and change your settings at > >> http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Soronel Haetir > > soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx > > __________ > > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > > > > __________ > > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > > > > > > > -- > Soronel Haetir > soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx > __________ > > View the list's information and change your settings at > http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > > __________� > > View the list's information and change your settings at > http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > > ------------------------------ End of jawsscripts Digest V3 #51 ******************************** __________� View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts