On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 08:32:32AM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 08:26:16AM +0100, Antonio Galea wrote:
n Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Marco Ciampa
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:11:24PM +0000, Paolo Debortoli wrote:
Pentagono open source: sembra una buona notizia sia per il marketing
che per lo sviluppo:
"Open-source software is also more secure than closed-source software,
by its very nature: the code is perpetually scrutinized by countless
users across the planet, and any weaknesses are shared immediately."
https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/14/16649042/pentagon-department-of-defense-open-source-software
Bella immagine:
"“How would the Trojans have reacted if the Horse statue the Greeks gave
them was made of glass and they could see right through it?”"
Bella notizia. Forse è anche l'hackeraggio ai danni dell'NSA che sta
dando frutti inattesi? :-)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/nsa-shadow-brokers.html
Security Breach and Spilled Secrets Have Shaken the N.S.A. to Its Core
Hahahahaha chi di spyware colpisce...
Beh ci sarebbe poco da ridere in realtà ... comunque questo è esattamente
ciò di cui gli esperti di sicurezza parlano: è da incoscienti aprire
falle, scoprirle e lasciarle aperte per i propri scopi... prima o poi ti
torna indietro tutto con gli interessi ...
The leaks have renewed a debate over whether the N.S.A. should be
permitted to stockpile vulnerabilities it discovers in commercial
software to use for spying — rather than immediately alert software
makers so the holes can be plugged. The agency claims it has shared with
the industry more than 90 percent of flaws it has found, reserving only
the most valuable for its own hackers. But if it can’t keep those from
leaking, as the last year has demonstrated, the resulting damage to
businesses and ordinary computer users around the world can be colossal.
The Trump administration says it will soon announce revisions to the
system, making it more transparent.