Terribilmente interessante... ----- Forwarded message from Patrick Ohnewein <patrick.ohnewein@xxxxxxxxx> ----- From: Patrick Ohnewein <patrick.ohnewein@xxxxxxxxx> To: Linux User Group Bozen-Bolzano-Bulsan <lugbz-list@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Lugbz-list] [Fwd: Re: French Government Lobbied to Ban Free Software] Reply-To: Linux User Group Bozen-Bolzano-Bulsan <lugbz-list@xxxxxxxxx> Sulla lista discussion della FSFE si parla di una legge sul DRM nella Francia. Visto che il tema DRM e' un tema scottante e visto che dopo la tematica dei brevetti (che non e' ancora finita) adesso ci servono tutte le nostre forze per affrontare il DRM, che e' un grande pericolo per le liberta delle persone, visto che trasferisce il potere alle macchine di limitare le liberta degli utenti. Vi forwardo un messaggio della lista, in cui Rui spiega in modo semplice e molto capibile il grande pericolo. Il link all' archivio per seguire la discussione: http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/2005-December/005259.html Happy hacking! Patrick -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: French Government Lobbied to Ban Free Software Datum: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:29:14 +0000 Von: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms@xxxxxxxx> An: discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Referenzen: <20051130175033.GA81794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133389168.8146.9.camel@ubuntu> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 22:19 +0000, Alex Hudson wrote: > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 18:50 +0100, Jerome Dominguez wrote: > > 25 November 2005. FSF France press release. Friday November 18th, > > 2005, French Department of Culture. SNEP and SCPP tell Free Software > > authors: "You shall change your licenses." SACEM add: "You shall stop > > publishing free software," and warn they are ready "to sue free > > software authors who will keep on publishing source code" should the > > "VU/SACEM/BSA/FA Contents Department"[1] bill pass in the Parliament. > > Could someone explain exactly what the problem is here? > > >From reading the article, I get the impression that the bill seeks to > prevent software accessing media without some form of DRM, which seems a > step beyond the already bad EUCD situation - is that right? >From what little I understood... Imagine you use Firefox to download a DRM'ed Windows Media Video file. Firefox would have to respect the copy prohibition embedded in that .WMV file, if it doesn't, it would be illegal to use it. Now imagine Firefox DOES respect the copy prohibition. Since Firefox is Free Software, it can be modified so it WON'T respect the prohibition. As such, it would be illegal to use it. These two situations are an example of what that law would turn illegal. If you dig to a lower level, maybe the network card driver should analise the content, I think. Rui _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion _______________________________________________ http://www.lugbz.org/mailman/listinfo/lugbz-list ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ -- Per iscriversi (o disiscriversi), basta spedire un messaggio con OGGETTO "subscribe" (o "unsubscribe") a mailto:linuxtrent-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx