Manfredi, Albert E wrote: The two Keys to the Kingdom seem to be 1) Switched Digital Video (SDV) to more efficiently use QAM channels and 2) "Cheap" All-Digital STB and HD-DVR that can be used to wean the MAJORITY of cable viewers from Expanded Analog to Digital. Even though that means the complication of adding an STB for most viewers (which may become less of a drawback in Feb2007). Exactly. The cable system can migrate gradually from the mix of digital and analog channel, and can migrate gradually from wastingbandwidth on simulcast SD and separate HD digital programs. Ditto migrate gradually to AVC, if that's even such a big deal here. So, do cable companys care about AVC now? Sure it buys you more programs...but, it they haven't even deployed the old technology yet. And as you imply, the cable company can promote, rather than discourage, the use of cable-ready receivers with CableCard (I take that as being your mention of Feb 2007), including the use of the new two-way CableCard upgrade,because people do generally despise STBs. Me included. I took them back and I am still analog only. It was one of those digital boxes that took3 secs or so for the picture to clear when you changed the channel. Plus, the PPV didnt work and they told me I needed to exchange the box. The cable-ready PVR market *should* be booming, as it is not so encumbered with legal issues as the built-in cable virtual PVRs are. PVRs, w/o removablediscs, are clearly meant for time-shifting only, and the FCC and courts *have* said that is okay. So in principle, nothing should be stopping this. (As if.) Really! When did TIVO come out, and everyone loves them. Butits just another service fee. Is that market (the PVR market) growing fast? I made my own because I want to record and keep my movies so I can watch them whenever I want. Plus how many PVRs let you edit the shows and add disks at will? This market has a long way to go.....we are still in theIce Age.... My point: I think your #2 choice becomes the favorite, unless cable systems insist on making life difficult for everyone including themselves. Any reluctance of CE companies to produce the required hardware is in large part caused by a perception that the service providers are doing all in their power to render such standard solutions obsolete even before they make it to market. The CE companies would love to build lots of cheap boxes; the problem is they don't know what to build! The service providers don't know what they need (another AVC complication). If all you want to do is decode channels thats one thing, but if want to start supporting the myriad of services and features that these technologies enable....("Cheap" All-Digital STB and HD-DVR..it aint gonna be cheap for a long long time.... unless cheap means crappy and barely functional; hopefully enough of us gave 'em back ;-) ) That's my perception of reality. (Perhaps "clueless as usual," as our self-professed experts claim.) And the really nice part about this WOULD be that these standardized cable solutions would also work for OTA users. Oh gee. I wonder if that makes them more or less likely to be implemented. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx[1] with the word unsubscribe in thesubject line. --- Links --- 1 mailto:opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.