On Aug 12, 2015, at 8:59 PM, Manfredi, Albert E
<albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, I like it fine, Craig.
This is AT&T attempting to make their growth of an old-school formula appear
more up to date, by re-stating what everyone else has also done. TVE exists,
so does mobility support. Nothing new there. Saying it's new doesn't make it
so.
"We're actually convinced as linear TV subscription and ARPU might get
pressured over time, the pricing is such that the mobility piece of revenue
and the fixed broadband piece of revenue move up. There's going to be a
re-shifting of revenue and our expectation is that we can probably grow
revenue per household for the foreseeable future."
I don't know if you read this part previously, Craig. What's growing is not
the number of people wanting linear streams. That's in decline.
AT&T chairman and CEO Randall Stephenson told analysts that the phone companySounds like TVE is rather central to AT&Ts plans.
saw the shift even before it started to pursue DirecTV last year. He added
that while cord-cutting and cord-shaving continues to cut into the pay TV
subscriber base, the answer could be in offering customers more flexibility
in where and when they watch programs.
“TV everywhere is what’s being consumed by a lot of millennials and our
research is bearing this out,” Stephenson said, adding that even as linear TV
customers decline as household growth rises, it is a “manageable decline.”
What's growing is basically everything else, including demand for broadband
and any form of TV over the Internet (on demand, mobile, OTT sites, what have
you).