As Intel walks away, Amazon is said to pursue licenses to compete with the MVPDs. The strategy could be based on selling the service at break even or a loss, with profits made by selling merchandise. Regards Craig http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304757004579334981130200324?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304757004579334981130200324.html Amazon Considering Online Pay-TV Service Live TV Channels Would Compete With Cable, Satellite Updated Jan. 21, 2014 8:29 p.m. ET Amazon.com Inc. has approached big entertainment companies about licensing their television channels for a possible new online pay-TV service, in what would be a significant expansion of the company's online video efforts. The new service it has discussed with media companies would offer live TV channels, such as those available now on cable or satellite TV. Through its Prime Instant Video service, Amazon now offers various TV shows and movies on demand for subscribers to its Prime free-shipping service. Several other tech companies are pursuing similar initiatives, including Sony Corp. and Google Inc. Intel Corp. said Tuesday it has sold its Internet TV-related technology to Verizon Communications Inc., which could use it to offer an online pay-TV service in the future. The new entrants hope their services will appeal to consumers who have dropped their traditional pay-TV connections or are looking to do so—whether out of frustration with outdated technology or rising bills. After initially declining to comment, Amazon said in a statement late Tuesday, "We continue to build selection for Prime Instant Video and create original shows at Amazon Studios, but we are not planning to license television channels or offer a pay-TV service."Amazon is still in the early stages of discussions with media companies, and it isn't clear it will move forward, the people familiar with the matter said. Amazon is also developing a set-top box to stream video, much like a Roku player, The Wall Street Journal previously reported. Amazon has approached at least three big media conglomerates seeking rights to distribute their channels online, people familiar with the matter said. Acquiring TV-channel rights has proved challenging for the other companies trying to launch Web TV services. Media giants that control TV networks and studios don't want to harm incumbent pay-TV providers, whose payments for carriage of channels are propelling the entertainment industry's growth. Those companies seeking to launch new services have struggled to negotiate licensing terms that would allow them to price their services competitively. Intel, for example, faced significant roadblocks in its efforts to acquire TV rights, media executives say, despite working on the project for about two years. Amazon has an advantage over some upstarts: It already has relationships with a range of TV networks and studios that it can use as a starting point for negotiations. Amazon invested about $1 billion in content in 2013, according to Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Youssef Squali. Spending on streaming video, as well as other initiatives like grocery delivery and mobile devices, has hurt the company's profit margins. Launching an online pay-TV service likely would mean higher content-licensing costs for its streaming video business. Amazon hasn't yet determined its business model for a virtual cable-TV service, the people familiar with the matter said. Tony Wible, an analyst at Janney Capital Markets, said Amazon may be able to offer an online-TV service "at cost" and make its money selling merchandise through the TV set. He noted that it "doesn't have a legacy margin structure" in the pay-TV business to protect. "There's a precedent of them pricing stuff roughly at cost in order to sell other stuff," Mr. Wible said. Analysts say companies offering bandwidth-hungry services could face increased technology-related costs after a federal appeals court decision this month struck down so-called "net neutrality" rules, paving the way for broadband providers to charge content companies tolls for quality service over their networks. That could affect the business models of streaming video giants like Netflix Inc. and Google Inc. but also the new entrants in online pay-TV like Sony and, potentially, Amazon. Verizon and Intel didn't disclose their deal's terms, but people familiar with the matter put the price at around $200 million. Intel had been developing a service called OnCue, which would let users watch both live and on-demand programming over the Internet. The service was also designed to record live programming on Intel's servers so viewers could catch up on shows without a DVR. The effort involved complex negotiations with content providers, in part because Intel hoped to record local programming as well as shows developed for a nationwide audience. The service fell victim to changing management priorities as Intel decided OnCue was a diversion from its core computer chip business. Brian Krzanich, who became Intel's CEO in May, signaled that he was uncomfortable with a project that relied so heavily on content relationships. He has put a higher priority on getting Intel chips into smartphones, tablets and wearable devices and boosting Intel's profitability. Verizon said it will buy rights to Intel's intellectual property and offer jobs to the bulk of the company's roughly 350 employees, who work in a separate building on Intel's headquarters campus in Santa Clara, Calif. Verizon expects the deal to bring advanced technology features to its pay-TV service, which is known as FiOS. Intel's technology could improve users' ability to search for content both on the television set and on a Verizon smartphone or tablet, where customers can already access dozens of channels, the company said. The deal could also help Verizon lay the groundwork to offer an Internet-based version of pay TV at some point, if it chooses to do so. "Strategically we're setting ourselves up in order to respond to the ecosystem as it evolves," Fran Shammo, Verizon's chief financial officer, said in an interview. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014 and will require regulatory approvals.