I think Rich Merritt misses the point that, with very few exceptions, all of these new web-based schemes, with their own STBs, are merely trying to create their own walled-in medium. But he correctly (IMO) groups together the congloms and the MVPDs as being those who currently control the content. The one exception I had in mind was the Sony Vaio I saw some time ago. That allowed access to the entire web, to OTA, to BluRay discs, allowed recording on its hard drive. An unsually unwalled design. This one comment from a reader is right on the money: ------------------ 9/3/2010 4:05 PM EDT The problem with DVR boxes is that they are built to restrict access, not to enable it. It is only very recently that they have added whole-house functionality and search capability, something that my Windows Media Center box has done for years. The DVR is a box that is under the complete control of the cable company, so why should I pay for it? CableCARD was supposed to break this monopoly, but the cablecos dragged their feet on it and forced so many restrictions that it was unusable. The interest generated by the recently-released Ceton InfiniTV card is an indication of the frustration of technically-capable users with this situation. Larry M. ------------------ Of course, he does assume that a DVR must be under the control of a MVPD. Then again, in this country, that is very close to the truth. Bert --------------------------------- http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4207341/How-set-tops-got-stuck-in-TV-transition How set-tops got stuck in a TV transition Rick Merritt 9/3/2010 9:52 AM EDT SAN JOSE, Calif. - When Steve Jobs held aloft his new $99 AppleTV box this week, most people applauded it as a dirt cheap deal. But Ira Bahr got excited because he thought it was relatively expensive. "Apple gives me hope someone will actually pay $99 for a set-top box," said the chief marketing officer for Dish Network who has been locked in a price war with other satellite, cable and telco TV providers. Indeed, the set-top box has become the Rodney Dangerfield of the consumer electronics industry. "I have customers calling in that want a digital video recorder or an upgrade to high definition but are outraged if they have to pay for a set top," said Bahr in a keynote address to about 200 people at Set-Top Box 2010 in San Jose. "Today we are no more interesting [to consumers] than an electric or gas company-it's just not exciting anymore," said Bahr, noting Comcast now gives away Apple iPods to entice new users to take its service and set-top. Service providers like Dish are doing all they can to add pizzazz to their little black pizza boxes. Dish is a partner in the GoogleTV initiative, aiming to deliver an Intel Atom-based set-top this fall that plugs users into a new service more closely linked to the Web and Web-like search. And Dish's set-top maker Echostar acquired Sling Media to provide video to PCs and handsets as well as TVs-the three-screen nirvana the industry is now seeking. Sounds like all the right moves. But the trouble is the days of cable and satellite TV networks are numbered. Something new is slowly being born. David Grubb, chief technology officer for Motorola Home was right to dub this the Internet era in his conference keynote. Television will become one application for TVs that increasingly will be multifunction devices, he said. This shift is bound to happen, but today's cable, satellite and telco TV providers and their vendors cannot truly embrace it. They are locked into Clayton Christensen's dilemma of trying to serve their existing networks and customers. Plenty of so-called over-the-top boxes have emerged in the last few years trying to ride the new paradigm, but they have lacked clout and content. Roku's Anthony Wood claims he invented the field two years ago with his $99 Netflix player that now comes in a standard definition version for as little as $59. These so-called buddy boxes are stuck in secondary roles as long as the majority of premium content is still locked into release windows on broadcast TV. Even Steve Jobs with all his Hollywood clout from Pixar had to content himself with an AppleTV box that would deliver only some select programs from a handful of content owners the day after their broadcast release. The fact is today's cable, satellite and telco TV networks still own the mainstream pipes to the consumer. Someday Joe Six-Pack will only need a good broadband connection and a TV-centric browser-likely with some new kind of remote control and search engine-to access any new or archived video you might imagine. But 2010 sits in an awkward spot when the old networks still have plenty of life and the new Internet set-tops still have plenty of problems. Many have tried and failed to make Web pages optimized for 640x480 pixel screens look good on a 1080-processive flat-panel TV. Junk drawers are full of novel keyboards and remotes for easily navigating the Net from the couch. And no one has yet delivered the browser-centric program guide for the Web TV era. For its part, Hollywood is still clutching its content libraries and release windows in fear of a free-Internet future. It's high time Hollywood and set-top box makers stop flirting and get married. The Internet TV era is theirs for the taking if they can let go of their old attachments to yesterday's cable and satellite networks. I suspect Apple has not delivered an iTV, in part because these technical and business problems are so difficult. It also has its hands full with other quite successful businesses. There's lots of work to be done enabling Web-a-vision. This transition could take a decade. So for awhile, the old set-top is stuck with its sad sack status of being the box that doesn't get any respect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.