Finally an article that speaks some sense about these wireless techniques. WiMax, IEEE 802.16, is much more like cellular and much less like Wi-Fi, in the sense that it's not a LAN. It is a point to point link between a host device of some sort and a base station. There is no sharing of the link among several hosts. So in order to get widepread use, the RF range will have to be reduced to small cells. And the spectrum is allocated on the basis of frequencies or time slots. Wi-Fi is meant to be used unlicensed, by anyone. So if a municipal service is so strong as to enter buildings, that would soon interfere with private use. In the 2.4 GHz band, the one more suited to penetrating through or around obstacles, there are only three non-overlapping frequencies available. Bert -------------------------------------- Muni Wi-Fi faces tech trouble, analyst warns Jack Shandle (07/19/2006 1:27 PM EDT) URL: http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=3D190900034 The viability of municipal Wi-Fi projects proposed for several major U.S. cities has been questioned by a leading wireless consultant on the grounds that the service will fall far short of user expectations and is not likely to be free, as initially promised. Describing municipal Wi-Fi networks such those proposed for Philadelphia and San Francisco "expensive, temperamental and prone to interference," Andy Seybold of the Andrew Seybold Group LLC, warned that there will be little if any in-building coverage and the service too unreliable for use in critical municipal functions. A police officer trying to use the Wi-Fi network during a car chase, for example, would have to stop his patrol car in order to make a call for assistance "and hope the car he is chasing waits for him." Seybold said. Philadelphia's proposed service-which was supposed to be free-now has a price tag of $20 a month, he said, and even that might be considered too pricy for a service that is mostly available outside homes and businesses. Earthlink, which Seybold described as "the most honest" of the muni Wi-Fi proponents, described its proposed service for San Diego as being available to 90% of the exterior walls of 90% of the buildings, he said. In some instances, mobile WiMAX (as specified in the IEEE 802.16e-2005 standard) has been proposed as part of municipal Wi-Fi networks. See What is mobile WiMAX. Seybold also had a dim view of mobile WiMAX's aspirations to become a major wireless technology but foresees its use in niche markets. When it is commercially available in mid-2007, mobile WiMAX will have a performance edge over competing cellular technologies, Seybold said, but it will be short lived. By comparing the respective technology roadmaps of mobile WiMAX and 3G cellular, Seybold concluded that mobile WiMAX's advantage-which is mostly due to its use of multiple antenna (MIMO) technology-will vanish in three years, which is not nearly enough time to recoup the level of capital investment required for mobile WiMAX to compete, as some WiMAX proponents have argued, for the existing cellular market. Seybold's remarks came at a meeting of the Wireless Communications Alliance (WCA), a Northern California non-profit group of companies and organizations dealing with wireless technologies. Another analyst on the panel did not object to Seybold's dim view of the success of municipal Wi-Fi but she did have a more optimistic view of mobile WiMAX's future. While agreeing that mobile WiMAX would have trouble gaining traction as a cellular alternative in the U.S., Monica Paolini, founder of Senza Fili Consulting, said in developing parts of the world where a complex cellular infrastructure does not exist, mobile WiMAX is a viable alternative. Paolini listed India, Latin America and Eastern Europe as being fertile ground for mobile WiMAX to take root. She also argued that even in developed countries mobile WiMAX could easily be used as an overlay of cellular networks for operators to provide additional bandwidth for video and other high-bandwidth services. Comparing the cellular and mobile WiMAX technology roadmaps, Paolini came to a somewhat different conclusion that Seybold: The two technologies are converging in terms of their constituent technologies. Both are on the road to adopting OFDMA for signaling and an IP core, she said. All material on this site Copyright 2006 CMP Media LLC. All rights reserved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.