But Nat if you replace the NTSC receiver with a DTV receiver and RF modulator (at station expense) you can then move those cable customers to the "digital" pile and get closer to the analog shutdown. I think that stations shouldn't fight the shutdown but instead race toward it. The cost of operating dual plants is a tremendous expense most small market stations or pub casters can't stand for long. We have also had a large jump in prices for analog transmitter parts for transmitters less than 5 years old. William Smith KET nat ostroff wrote: > To clarify my last transmission. The count for NTSC receiving Head Ends > should only be those that get the NTSC signal via an off air feed. I think > it is still a large number and it should be able to be determined with a > little phone work in each market. Feeding the head end with fiber or > microwave is thus counter productive to the broadcasters position. > > Nat Ostroff > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "nat ostroff" <nostroff@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:35 PM > Subject: [opendtv] Re: NTSC Cutoff Date > > > >>Ahh, the off air feed. If the FCC wants to count all Digitally received >>signals at the head end of a cable company as serving the subs with a >>digital signal even if it is delivered in the form of good old NTSC then >>they should be forced to count all of the subs who get their cable signal >>from a head end that is fed with NTSC as being served with an off air >>signal. That should change the satisitcs to well below the 85% trigger >>level. Is it not time for the broadcasters to make that point? >> >>This is Mark Aitkens idea and I think it is a good one. >> >>Nat Ostroff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.