Isn't this use case here software-only? John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de John Shutt Enviado el: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 5:47 AM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: News: Intel introduces chips designed to improve Internet video quality Craig, I couldn't disagree with you more. Far from being ludicrous, adding 1080p60 to MPEG-2 makes sense to me. MPEG-2, at higher bitrates and 4:2:2 color space, is a relatively benign way to encode material for editing and other manipulation before ultimate emission. MPEG-4, especially if the full toolkit is used, not just the basic level that is used for videoconferencing and those cheapie "H.264" internet encoders, makes for a good one time encode for emission, but is not suitable for multiple "passes" in the typical production process MPEG-2 1080p60 4:2:2 can compete effectively with HDCam's 3:1:1 or DVCPRO 100's 4:1:1 color spaces for NLE. Now, if you're just talking emission standards then yes, I agree it is ludicrous. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.