[opendtv] Re: News: Reps. Barton, Stearns Offer Alternative DTV Bill

From: Bob Miller <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx>
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:38:09 -0500
So how many stations will be sans analog on February 18th if this
passes? I here that 400 stations or more have notified the FCC that
they will switch off analog on February 17th which this bill allows.
Add Hawaii, others that have already switched off analog and those
that will notify the FCC that they will switch off analog on the 17th
between now and then, we could have over a thousand stations dropping
analog on the 17th.

What does that mean for this bill? I think it is just a fig leaf for
those in DC to say we did what we could.

Bob Miller

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/162908-Reps_Barton_Stearns_Offer_Alternative_DTV_Bill.php
>
> Reps. Barton, Stearns Offer Alternative DTV Bill
> Addressed their thoughts in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
> By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 1/28/2009 12:48:17 PM MT
>
> Two of the most vocal critics of moving the DTV date wasted no time in
> offering up their alternative solution.
>
> In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) and Cliff
> Stearns (R-FL), not long after a Senate bill to move the DTV date failed to
> pass in the House, said that the DTV transition was "neither stuck nor
> broke," and that problems could be overcome with a "dollop of real
> bipartisanship."
>
> That was possible, they said, "now that S. 328, the Senate's DTV-delay bill,
> has failed to gain sufficient support to pass without bypassing the regular
> procedures of the House of Representatives."
>
> The bill would have passed under regular procedures since it had a clear
> majority--258 for, 168 against. But it had been offered on suspension, which
> is a way to fast-track the bill by limiting debate and amendments. But the
> quid pro quo is that it requires a two-thirds majority for passage.
> The Barton and Stearns solution is a bill that would free up $250 million
> more in funds and preclude the need for $650 million in coupon anbd DTV
> education funds that was put in the economic stimulus package.
>
> As Barton pointed out in the letter, he was working on a similar bill with
> Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) when the Barack Obama transition team preempted that
> effort with a push to change the date.
>
> Barton told Pelosi that the bill had 11 co-sponsors.
>
> The full text of the letter, which also went to House Energy & Commerce
> Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Telecommunications & Internet
> Subcommittee Chairman Rick Boucher (D-VA), is below.
>
> January 28, 2009
> The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
> Speaker
> U.S. House of Representatives
> H - 232, U.S. Capitol
> Washington, D.C.
>
> Dear Speaker Pelosi:
>
> Now that S. 328, the Senate's DTV-delay bill, has failed to gain sufficient
> support to pass without bypassing the regular procedures of the House of
> Representatives, all of us have work to do. The DTV transition program is
> neither stuck nor broke. There are problems, but they can be overcome with
> your help and a dollop of real bipartisanship.
>
> A solution recommended by the Commerce Department currently exists in the
> form of H.R. 661. That bill or similar legislation will help television
> viewers without jeopardizing public safety, and it constitutes the most
> realistic chance for a real broadband stimulus without spending an extra
> $650 million.
>
> H.R. 661 authorizes $250 million more for converter box coupons. It would
> clear the waiting list in just two weeks. We might even get most of the
> money back at the end of the program in coupons that people choose not to
> use. The legislation is based on the proposal the Commerce Department
> outlined in a Jan. 14 letter to Democratic and Republican leaders in both
> chambers of Congress.
>
> It will finally give public safety officials the broadcast frequencies we
> promised them 10 years ago so they can save lives, and it lets wireless
> providers actually use the spectrum they've already paid $20 billion to get.
>
> Mr. Stearns and I, along with eleven of our colleagues, are sponsors of the
> pending legislation, but it hardly matters whose name is on any bill that
> constitutes a strong, bipartisan solution to the DTV dilemma that both
> political parties face equally. More to the point, passing the Commerce
> Department's recommended solution will require your leadership and your
> party's active support. Getting the job done in time cannot be about laying
> blame or gaining credit, but about making the transition work.
>
> We were working with Congressman Markey the first week of January on a bill
> to address the issues without throwing a monkey wrench into the program by
> stalling the transition. Had that work not been interrupted by the
> transition team's intervention, it seems likely that a bipartisan bill could
> have been through the House and the Senate already. We don't have much time
> left to pick up the pieces, but that's what we need to do, and your direct
> involvement and support right now can make all the difference.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.
[opendtv] Re: News: Reps. Barton, Stearns Offer Alternative DTV Bill

Other related posts:
